gpt-5.6-terra
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-5.6-terravsgpt-6-sol
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-6-sol
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
gpt-5.6-terra
text, image
gpt-6-sol
text, image, json
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gpt-5.6-terra · leads in 3
83%
Strong
gpt-6-sol · leads in 25
84%
Strong
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-5.6-terra92%gpt-6-solLeads93%Logical reasoning
gpt-5.6-terra87%gpt-6-sol87%Mathematics
gpt-5.6-terra90%gpt-6-solLeads93%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-5.6-terra87%gpt-6-solLeads88%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-5.6-terra85%gpt-6-solLeads86%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-5.6-terra81%gpt-6-solLeads84%Debugging and code review
gpt-5.6-terra88%gpt-6-solLeads90%Agentic coding
gpt-5.6-terra90%gpt-6-solLeads91%Tool and function calling
gpt-5.6-terra87%gpt-6-solLeads88%SQL and query writing
gpt-5.6-terra90%gpt-6-solLeads92%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-5.6-terra80%gpt-6-sol80%Professional writing
gpt-5.6-terra84%gpt-6-solLeads85%Conversational quality
gpt-5.6-terra85%gpt-6-solLeads86%Multilingual ability
gpt-5.6-terra81%gpt-6-solLeads84%Translation
gpt-5.6-terra88%gpt-6-solLeads89%Summarization
gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%gpt-6-sol84%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-5.6-terra90%gpt-6-solLeads94%Professional domains
gpt-5.6-terra85%gpt-6-solLeads87%Information extraction
gpt-5.6-terra91%gpt-6-solLeads94%Classification and labeling
gpt-5.6-terra96%gpt-6-solLeads98%Long-context handling
gpt-5.6-terra85%gpt-6-solLeads87%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-5.6-terra83%gpt-6-solLeads86%Structured output
gpt-5.6-terra89%gpt-6-solLeads96%Factual accuracy
gpt-5.6-terra82%gpt-6-solLeads83%Safety and alignment
gpt-5.6-terra74%gpt-6-solLeads76%Steerability
gpt-5.6-terra80%gpt-6-solLeads82%Output consistency
gpt-5.6-terra90%gpt-6-solLeads91%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-5.6-terraLeads44%gpt-6-sol39%Cost efficiency
gpt-5.6-terraLeads66%gpt-6-sol47%Image understanding
gpt-5.6-terra59%gpt-6-solLeads63%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-5.6-terra
93.73%
gpt-6-sol
87.5%
Average response time
gpt-5.6-terra
29,135.19 ms
gpt-6-sol
25,735 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-5.6-terra
60,000 ms
gpt-6-sol
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-terra: 100%gpt-6-sol: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-terra: 17,864 msgpt-6-sol: 1,319 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-terra: 60,000 msgpt-6-sol: 2,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…