LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

DeepSeek logo

deepseek-v4-provsgpt-5.6-terra

OpenAI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

deepseek-v4-pro

Checking current pricing…

gpt-5.6-terra

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

deepseek-v4-pro

text

gpt-5.6-terra

text, image

Vision

deepseek-v4-pro

Not supported

gpt-5.6-terraBetter fit

Supported

Reasoning

deepseek-v4-pro

Not supported

gpt-5.6-terraBetter fit

Supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

deepseek-v4-pro · leads in 0

46%

Weak

gpt-5.6-terra · leads in 29

83%

Strong

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    deepseek-v4-pro48%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads92%
  • Logical reasoning

    deepseek-v4-pro26%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%
  • Mathematics

    deepseek-v4-pro63%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    deepseek-v4-pro57%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    deepseek-v4-pro26%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    deepseek-v4-pro60%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads81%
  • Debugging and code review

    deepseek-v4-pro49%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads88%
  • Agentic coding

    deepseek-v4-pro42%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%
  • Tool and function calling

    deepseek-v4-pro42%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads87%
  • SQL and query writing

    deepseek-v4-pro58%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    deepseek-v4-pro34%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads80%
  • Professional writing

    deepseek-v4-pro42%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads84%
  • Conversational quality

    deepseek-v4-pro34%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%
  • Multilingual ability

    deepseek-v4-pro59%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads81%
  • Translation

    deepseek-v4-pro48%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads88%
  • Summarization

    deepseek-v4-pro53%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    deepseek-v4-pro51%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%
  • Professional domains

    deepseek-v4-pro44%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%
  • Information extraction

    deepseek-v4-pro51%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads91%
  • Classification and labeling

    deepseek-v4-pro49%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads96%
  • Long-context handling

    deepseek-v4-pro75%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads85%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    deepseek-v4-pro40%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads83%
  • Structured output

    deepseek-v4-pro59%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads89%
  • Factual accuracy

    deepseek-v4-pro44%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads82%
  • Safety and alignment

    deepseek-v4-pro34%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads74%
  • Steerability

    deepseek-v4-pro36%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads80%
  • Output consistency

    deepseek-v4-pro59%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads90%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    deepseek-v4-pro32%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads44%
  • Cost efficiency

    deepseek-v4-pro30%
    gpt-5.6-terraLeads66%
  • Image understanding

    deepseek-v4-proNo image input
    gpt-5.6-terra59%

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

deepseek-v4-pro

99.37%

gpt-5.6-terra

93.73%

Average response time

deepseek-v4-pro

21,349.57 ms

gpt-5.6-terra

29,135.19 ms

P95 API latency

deepseek-v4-pro

60,000 ms

gpt-5.6-terra

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

deepseek-v4-pro: 100%gpt-5.6-terra: 100%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

deepseek-v4-pro: 21,275 msgpt-5.6-terra: 17,864 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

deepseek-v4-pro: 60,000 msgpt-5.6-terra: 60,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • gpt-5.6-terra supports image input while the other model does not.
  • deepseek-v4-pro recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.

Keep exploring