gpt-5.6-luna
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-5.6-lunavsllama-4-maverick
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
llama-4-maverick
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
JSON mode
gpt-5.6-lunaBetter fit
Supported
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
Reasoning
gpt-5.6-lunaBetter fit
Supported
llama-4-maverick
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gpt-5.6-luna · leads in 29
79%
Moderate
llama-4-maverick · leads in 1
40%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads89%llama-4-maverick60%Logical reasoning
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%llama-4-maverick26%Mathematics
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads86%llama-4-maverick36%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads81%llama-4-maverick45%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%llama-4-maverick25%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads78%llama-4-maverick36%Debugging and code review
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%llama-4-maverick33%Agentic coding
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads82%llama-4-maverick34%Tool and function calling
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads85%llama-4-maverick36%SQL and query writing
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads86%llama-4-maverick34%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads78%llama-4-maverick48%Professional writing
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads82%llama-4-maverick39%Conversational quality
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%llama-4-maverick38%Multilingual ability
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads77%llama-4-maverick62%Translation
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads84%llama-4-maverick47%Summarization
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads64%llama-4-maverick57%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads81%llama-4-maverick38%Professional domains
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads80%llama-4-maverick41%Information extraction
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads86%llama-4-maverick27%Classification and labeling
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads95%llama-4-maverick49%Long-context handling
gpt-5.6-luna32%llama-4-maverickLeads89%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads81%llama-4-maverick19%Structured output
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads87%llama-4-maverick7%Factual accuracy
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads79%llama-4-maverick44%Safety and alignment
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads72%llama-4-maverick41%Steerability
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads79%llama-4-maverick31%Output consistency
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads88%llama-4-maverick41%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads59%llama-4-maverick45%Cost efficiency
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads94%llama-4-maverick46%Image understanding
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads53%llama-4-maverick25%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-5.6-luna
82.59%
llama-4-maverick
95.34%
Average response time
gpt-5.6-luna
57,896.19 ms
llama-4-maverick
4,496.14 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-5.6-luna
60,000 ms
llama-4-maverick
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-luna: 53.1%llama-4-maverick: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-luna: 99,082 msllama-4-maverick: 4,572 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-luna: 60,000 msllama-4-maverick: 5,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- llama-4-maverick recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- llama-4-maverick recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.