LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Z.ai logo

glm-5.2vsmistral-large-3:675b

Mistral AI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

mistral-large-3:675b

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

glm-5.2Better fit

976,000 tokens

mistral-large-3:675b

256,000 tokens

Input formats

glm-5.2

text

mistral-large-3:675b

text, image

Vision

glm-5.2

Not supported

mistral-large-3:675bBetter fit

Supported

JSON mode

glm-5.2Better fit

Supported

mistral-large-3:675b

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

glm-5.2 · leads in 17

56%

Moderate

mistral-large-3:675b · leads in 9

49%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    glm-5.250%
    mistral-large-3:675bLeads52%
  • Logical reasoning

    glm-5.257%
    mistral-large-3:675b57%
  • Mathematics

    glm-5.262%
    mistral-large-3:675b62%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    glm-5.256%
    mistral-large-3:675bLeads62%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    glm-5.2Leads57%
    mistral-large-3:675b55%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    glm-5.247%
    mistral-large-3:675bLeads49%
  • Debugging and code review

    glm-5.2Leads58%
    mistral-large-3:675b56%
  • Agentic coding

    glm-5.2Leads61%
    mistral-large-3:675b54%
  • Tool and function calling

    glm-5.2Leads55%
    mistral-large-3:675b54%
  • SQL and query writing

    glm-5.2Leads63%
    mistral-large-3:675b55%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    glm-5.244%
    mistral-large-3:675bLeads50%
  • Professional writing

    glm-5.2Leads51%
    mistral-large-3:675b49%
  • Conversational quality

    glm-5.249%
    mistral-large-3:675bLeads50%
  • Multilingual ability

    glm-5.284%
    mistral-large-3:675bLeads86%
  • Translation

    glm-5.2Leads61%
    mistral-large-3:675b59%
  • Summarization

    glm-5.2Leads57%
    mistral-large-3:675b45%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    glm-5.2Leads61%
    mistral-large-3:675b54%
  • Professional domains

    glm-5.253%
    mistral-large-3:675bLeads56%
  • Information extraction

    glm-5.2Leads61%
    mistral-large-3:675b33%
  • Classification and labeling

    glm-5.2Leads61%
    mistral-large-3:675b54%
  • Long-context handling

    glm-5.2Leads67%
    mistral-large-3:675b44%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    glm-5.2Leads53%
    mistral-large-3:675b36%
  • Structured output

    glm-5.2Leads60%
    mistral-large-3:675b9%
  • Factual accuracy

    glm-5.250%
    mistral-large-3:675bLeads52%
  • Safety and alignment

    glm-5.245%
    mistral-large-3:675b45%
  • Steerability

    glm-5.2Leads49%
    mistral-large-3:675b46%
  • Output consistency

    glm-5.2Leads60%
    mistral-large-3:675b54%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    glm-5.2Leads37%
    mistral-large-3:675b34%
  • Cost efficiency

    glm-5.243%
    mistral-large-3:675bLeads48%
  • Image understanding

    glm-5.2No image input
    mistral-large-3:675b17%

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

glm-5.2

99.94%

mistral-large-3:675b

100%

Average response time

glm-5.2

2,766.68 ms

mistral-large-3:675b

17,950.15 ms

P95 API latency

glm-5.2

10,000 ms

mistral-large-3:675b

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

glm-5.2: 100%mistral-large-3:675b: 100%
25 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

glm-5.2: 666 msmistral-large-3:675b: 15,337 ms
25 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

glm-5.2: 5,000 msmistral-large-3:675b: 30,000 ms
25 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • glm-5.2 has a larger context window.
  • mistral-large-3:675b supports image input while the other model does not.
  • The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
  • glm-5.2 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring