LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

gemma4:31bvsgpt-6-luna

OpenAI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

gemma4:31b · leads in 1

34%

Weak

gpt-6-luna · leads in 28

52%

Moderate

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    gemma4:31b33%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads72%
  • Logical reasoning

    gemma4:31b19%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads28%
  • Mathematics

    gemma4:31b31%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads42%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    gemma4:31b34%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads46%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    gemma4:31b17%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads29%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    gemma4:31b33%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads49%
  • Debugging and code review

    gemma4:31b29%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads39%
  • Agentic coding

    gemma4:31b26%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads35%
  • Tool and function calling

    gemma4:31b29%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads52%
  • SQL and query writing

    gemma4:31b34%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads48%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    gemma4:31b33%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads54%
  • Professional writing

    gemma4:31b31%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads59%
  • Conversational quality

    gemma4:31b23%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads54%
  • Multilingual ability

    gemma4:31b44%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads61%
  • Translation

    gemma4:31b32%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads57%
  • Summarization

    gemma4:31b31%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads37%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    gemma4:31b29%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads39%
  • Professional domains

    gemma4:31b26%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads49%
  • Information extraction

    gemma4:31b35%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads57%
  • Classification and labeling

    gemma4:31b38%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads62%
  • Long-context handling

    gemma4:31bLeads39%
    gpt-6-luna22%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    gemma4:31b29%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads55%
  • Structured output

    gemma4:31b46%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads70%
  • Factual accuracy

    gemma4:31b34%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads59%
  • Safety and alignment

    gemma4:31b31%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads59%
  • Steerability

    gemma4:31b28%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads53%
  • Output consistency

    gemma4:31b57%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads80%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    gemma4:31b48%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads59%
  • Cost efficiency

    gemma4:31b59%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads71%
  • Image understanding

    gemma4:31bNo image input
    gpt-6-lunaNo image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

gemma4:31b

99.73%

gpt-6-luna

92.86%

Average response time

gemma4:31b

6,204.99 ms

gpt-6-luna

47,470.23 ms

P95 API latency

gemma4:31b

30,000 ms

gpt-6-luna

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

gemma4:31b: 100%gpt-6-luna: 92.6%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemma4:31b: 6,773 msgpt-6-luna: 48,342 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemma4:31b: 30,000 msgpt-6-luna: 60,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • gemma4:31b recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • gemma4:31b recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring