LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Google logo

gemini-3-flashvsgpt-6-astra

OpenAI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

gemini-3-flash

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

gemini-3-flashBetter fit

1,048,576 tokens

gpt-6-astra

1,000,000 tokens

Input formats

gemini-3-flash

text

gpt-6-astra

text, image

Vision

gemini-3-flash

Not supported

gpt-6-astraBetter fit

Supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

gemini-3-flash · leads in 4

71%

Moderate

gpt-6-astra · leads in 25

76%

Moderate

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    gemini-3-flash67%
    gpt-6-astraLeads87%
  • Logical reasoning

    gemini-3-flash64%
    gpt-6-astraLeads81%
  • Mathematics

    gemini-3-flash66%
    gpt-6-astraLeads83%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    gemini-3-flash63%
    gpt-6-astraLeads81%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    gemini-3-flash63%
    gpt-6-astraLeads81%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    gemini-3-flash59%
    gpt-6-astraLeads75%
  • Debugging and code review

    gemini-3-flash65%
    gpt-6-astraLeads82%
  • Agentic coding

    gemini-3-flash72%
    gpt-6-astraLeads83%
  • Tool and function calling

    gemini-3-flash69%
    gpt-6-astraLeads82%
  • SQL and query writing

    gemini-3-flash70%
    gpt-6-astraLeads82%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    gemini-3-flash53%
    gpt-6-astraLeads77%
  • Professional writing

    gemini-3-flash60%
    gpt-6-astraLeads79%
  • Conversational quality

    gemini-3-flash60%
    gpt-6-astraLeads80%
  • Multilingual ability

    gemini-3-flashLeads94%
    gpt-6-astra76%
  • Translation

    gemini-3-flash74%
    gpt-6-astraLeads81%
  • Summarization

    gemini-3-flash72%
    gpt-6-astraLeads77%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    gemini-3-flash75%
    gpt-6-astraLeads84%
  • Professional domains

    gemini-3-flash61%
    gpt-6-astraLeads81%
  • Information extraction

    gemini-3-flash76%
    gpt-6-astraLeads82%
  • Classification and labeling

    gemini-3-flash82%
    gpt-6-astraLeads86%
  • Long-context handling

    gemini-3-flashLeads97%
    gpt-6-astra84%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    gemini-3-flash63%
    gpt-6-astraLeads78%
  • Structured output

    gemini-3-flash77%
    gpt-6-astraLeads84%
  • Factual accuracy

    gemini-3-flash69%
    gpt-6-astraLeads75%
  • Safety and alignment

    gemini-3-flash64%
    gpt-6-astraLeads72%
  • Steerability

    gemini-3-flash56%
    gpt-6-astraLeads77%
  • Output consistency

    gemini-3-flash74%
    gpt-6-astraLeads80%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    gemini-3-flashLeads93%
    gpt-6-astra30%
  • Cost efficiency

    gemini-3-flashLeads88%
    gpt-6-astra28%
  • Image understanding

    gemini-3-flashNo image input
    gpt-6-astra61%

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

gemini-3-flash

87.03%

gpt-6-astra

95.42%

Average response time

gemini-3-flash

5,576.7 ms

gpt-6-astra

14,182.07 ms

P95 API latency

gemini-3-flash

30,000 ms

gpt-6-astra

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3-flash: 99.7%gpt-6-astra: 100%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3-flash: 5,803 msgpt-6-astra: 4,296 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3-flash: 30,000 msgpt-6-astra: 10,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • gemini-3-flash has a larger context window.
  • gpt-6-astra supports image input while the other model does not.
  • gpt-6-astra recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • gemini-3-flash recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring