gpt-6-astra
Chat comparison
gpt-6-astravsInkling-Small
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
Inkling-Small
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gpt-6-astraBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
Inkling-Small
512,000 tokens
Input formats
gpt-6-astra
text, image
Inkling-Small
text
Vision
gpt-6-astraBetter fit
Supported
Inkling-Small
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
gpt-6-astra · leads in 27
76%
Moderate
Inkling-Small · leads in 2
28%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-6-astraLeads87%Inkling-Small12%Logical reasoning
gpt-6-astraLeads81%Inkling-Small33%Mathematics
gpt-6-astraLeads83%Inkling-Small25%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-6-astraLeads81%Inkling-Small21%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-6-astraLeads81%Inkling-Small36%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-6-astraLeads75%Inkling-Small21%Debugging and code review
gpt-6-astraLeads82%Inkling-Small31%Agentic coding
gpt-6-astraLeads83%Inkling-Small41%Tool and function calling
gpt-6-astraLeads82%Inkling-Small33%SQL and query writing
gpt-6-astraLeads82%Inkling-Small27%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-6-astraLeads77%Inkling-Small26%Professional writing
gpt-6-astraLeads79%Inkling-Small23%Conversational quality
gpt-6-astraLeads80%Inkling-Small19%Multilingual ability
gpt-6-astraLeads76%Inkling-Small13%Translation
gpt-6-astraLeads81%Inkling-Small18%Summarization
gpt-6-astraLeads77%Inkling-Small28%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-6-astraLeads84%Inkling-Small30%Professional domains
gpt-6-astraLeads81%Inkling-Small24%Information extraction
gpt-6-astraLeads82%Inkling-Small30%Classification and labeling
gpt-6-astraLeads86%Inkling-Small25%Long-context handling
gpt-6-astraLeads84%Inkling-Small49%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-6-astraLeads78%Inkling-Small26%Structured output
gpt-6-astraLeads84%Inkling-Small37%Factual accuracy
gpt-6-astraLeads75%Inkling-Small17%Safety and alignment
gpt-6-astraLeads72%Inkling-Small20%Steerability
gpt-6-astraLeads77%Inkling-Small26%Output consistency
gpt-6-astraLeads80%Inkling-Small38%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-6-astra30%Inkling-SmallLeads54%Cost efficiency
gpt-6-astra28%Inkling-SmallLeads31%Image understanding
gpt-6-astra61%Inkling-SmallNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-6-astra
95.42%
Inkling-Small
100%
Average response time
gpt-6-astra
14,182.07 ms
Inkling-Small
1,109 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-6-astra
60,000 ms
Inkling-Small
2,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- gpt-6-astra has a larger context window.
- gpt-6-astra supports image input while the other model does not.