gemini-3.6-flash-high
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gemini-3.6-flash-highvsmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
gemini-3.6-flash-high
text, json
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
text
Tool calling
gemini-3.6-flash-highBetter fit
Supported
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Not supported
Reasoning
gemini-3.6-flash-highBetter fit
Supported
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gemini-3.6-flash-high · leads in 28
71%
Moderate
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407 · leads in 0
34%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads73%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240724%Logical reasoning
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads70%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240715%Mathematics
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads73%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240727%Scientific and technical depth
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads68%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240723%Planning and task decomposition
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads67%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240711%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads65%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240735%Debugging and code review
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads69%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240724%Agentic coding
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads69%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-24078%Tool and function calling
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads76%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-24077%SQL and query writing
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads73%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240735%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads56%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240728%Professional writing
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads64%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240730%Conversational quality
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads65%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240730%Multilingual ability
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads99%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240765%Translation
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads77%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240732%Summarization
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads53%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240725%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads77%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240721%Professional domains
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads65%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240718%Information extraction
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads78%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240735%Classification and labeling
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads85%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240737%Long-context handling
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads37%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240729%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads70%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240745%Structured output
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads87%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240751%Factual accuracy
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads73%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240737%Safety and alignment
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads69%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240733%Steerability
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads62%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240739%Output consistency
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads77%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240771%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads91%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240776%Cost efficiency
gemini-3.6-flash-high84%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240784%Image understanding
gemini-3.6-flash-highNo image inputmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemini-3.6-flash-high
99.2%
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
99.4%
Average response time
gemini-3.6-flash-high
9,446.51 ms
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
5,547.3 ms
P95 API latency
gemini-3.6-flash-high
30,000 ms
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.6-flash-high: 85.7%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 97.1%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.6-flash-high: 24,682 msmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 2,920 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.6-flash-high: 60,000 msmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 30,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
Keep exploring
About gemini-3.6-flash-highAbout mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407gemini-3.6-flash-high vs glm-5.3gemini-3.6-flash-high vs glm-5.2anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 vs gemini-3.6-flash-highgpt-5.6-sol vs mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407gemini-3.1-pro vs mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407