gemini-3.1-pro
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gemini-3.1-provsminimax-m2.7
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
minimax-m2.7
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Streaming
gemini-3.1-proBetter fit
Supported
minimax-m2.7
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gemini-3.1-pro · leads in 27
69%
Moderate
minimax-m2.7 · leads in 2
41%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%minimax-m2.727%Logical reasoning
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%minimax-m2.742%Mathematics
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%minimax-m2.740%Scientific and technical depth
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%minimax-m2.729%Planning and task decomposition
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%minimax-m2.744%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gemini-3.1-proLeads64%minimax-m2.730%Debugging and code review
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%minimax-m2.737%Agentic coding
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%minimax-m2.746%Tool and function calling
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%minimax-m2.744%SQL and query writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%minimax-m2.737%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads61%minimax-m2.730%Professional writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%minimax-m2.730%Conversational quality
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%minimax-m2.736%Multilingual ability
gemini-3.1-proLeads98%minimax-m2.760%Translation
gemini-3.1-proLeads78%minimax-m2.742%Summarization
gemini-3.1-proLeads55%minimax-m2.731%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gemini-3.1-proLeads75%minimax-m2.736%Professional domains
gemini-3.1-proLeads70%minimax-m2.728%Information extraction
gemini-3.1-proLeads72%minimax-m2.742%Classification and labeling
gemini-3.1-proLeads79%minimax-m2.743%Long-context handling
gemini-3.1-proLeads40%minimax-m2.735%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%minimax-m2.739%Structured output
gemini-3.1-proLeads77%minimax-m2.747%Factual accuracy
gemini-3.1-proLeads75%minimax-m2.731%Safety and alignment
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%minimax-m2.730%Steerability
gemini-3.1-proLeads62%minimax-m2.737%Output consistency
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%minimax-m2.748%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gemini-3.1-pro47%minimax-m2.7Leads72%Cost efficiency
gemini-3.1-pro54%minimax-m2.7Leads87%Image understanding
gemini-3.1-proNo image inputminimax-m2.7No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemini-3.1-pro
89.68%
minimax-m2.7
89.62%
Average response time
gemini-3.1-pro
39,780.78 ms
minimax-m2.7
22,830.99 ms
P95 API latency
gemini-3.1-pro
60,000 ms
minimax-m2.7
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 85.7%minimax-m2.7: 92.9%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 43,687 msminimax-m2.7: 19,194 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 60,000 msminimax-m2.7: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.