gemini-3.1-pro
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gemini-3.1-provskimi-k3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k3
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Reasoning
gemini-3.1-proBetter fit
Supported
kimi-k3
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gemini-3.1-pro · leads in 27
69%
Moderate
kimi-k3 · leads in 2
40%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%kimi-k340%Logical reasoning
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%kimi-k322%Mathematics
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%kimi-k339%Scientific and technical depth
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%kimi-k332%Planning and task decomposition
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%kimi-k323%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gemini-3.1-proLeads64%kimi-k331%Debugging and code review
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%kimi-k329%Agentic coding
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%kimi-k333%Tool and function calling
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%kimi-k335%SQL and query writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%kimi-k335%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads61%kimi-k334%Professional writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%kimi-k337%Conversational quality
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%kimi-k334%Multilingual ability
gemini-3.1-proLeads98%kimi-k361%Translation
gemini-3.1-proLeads78%kimi-k346%Summarization
gemini-3.1-pro55%kimi-k3Leads62%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gemini-3.1-proLeads75%kimi-k343%Professional domains
gemini-3.1-proLeads70%kimi-k334%Information extraction
gemini-3.1-proLeads72%kimi-k351%Classification and labeling
gemini-3.1-proLeads79%kimi-k341%Long-context handling
gemini-3.1-pro40%kimi-k3Leads85%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%kimi-k334%Structured output
gemini-3.1-proLeads77%kimi-k350%Factual accuracy
gemini-3.1-proLeads75%kimi-k340%Safety and alignment
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%kimi-k334%Steerability
gemini-3.1-proLeads62%kimi-k329%Output consistency
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%kimi-k348%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gemini-3.1-proLeads47%kimi-k335%Cost efficiency
gemini-3.1-proLeads54%kimi-k339%Image understanding
gemini-3.1-proNo image inputkimi-k3No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemini-3.1-pro
89.68%
kimi-k3
97.87%
Average response time
gemini-3.1-pro
39,780.78 ms
kimi-k3
12,694.11 ms
P95 API latency
gemini-3.1-pro
60,000 ms
kimi-k3
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 85.7%kimi-k3: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 43,687 mskimi-k3: 69,350 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 60,000 mskimi-k3: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- kimi-k3 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.