deepseek-v4-pro
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
deepseek-v4-provskimi-k2.6
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k2.6
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
deepseek-v4-proBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
kimi-k2.6
262,000 tokens
Input formats
deepseek-v4-pro
text
kimi-k2.6
text, json
Reasoning
deepseek-v4-pro
Not supported
kimi-k2.6Better fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
deepseek-v4-pro · leads in 5
46%
Weak
kimi-k2.6 · leads in 24
54%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
deepseek-v4-proLeads48%kimi-k2.647%Logical reasoning
deepseek-v4-pro26%kimi-k2.6Leads60%Mathematics
deepseek-v4-pro63%kimi-k2.6Leads67%Scientific and technical depth
deepseek-v4-proLeads57%kimi-k2.653%Planning and task decomposition
deepseek-v4-pro26%kimi-k2.6Leads59%
Coding & tools
Code generation
deepseek-v4-proLeads60%kimi-k2.650%Debugging and code review
deepseek-v4-pro49%kimi-k2.6Leads58%Agentic coding
deepseek-v4-pro42%kimi-k2.6Leads60%Tool and function calling
deepseek-v4-pro42%kimi-k2.6Leads56%SQL and query writing
deepseek-v4-pro58%kimi-k2.6Leads59%
Writing & language
Creative writing
deepseek-v4-pro34%kimi-k2.6Leads44%Professional writing
deepseek-v4-pro42%kimi-k2.6Leads49%Conversational quality
deepseek-v4-pro34%kimi-k2.6Leads51%Multilingual ability
deepseek-v4-pro59%kimi-k2.6Leads65%Translation
deepseek-v4-pro48%kimi-k2.6Leads57%Summarization
deepseek-v4-pro53%kimi-k2.6Leads54%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
deepseek-v4-pro51%kimi-k2.6Leads62%Professional domains
deepseek-v4-pro44%kimi-k2.6Leads50%Information extraction
deepseek-v4-pro51%kimi-k2.6Leads64%Classification and labeling
deepseek-v4-pro49%kimi-k2.6Leads55%Long-context handling
deepseek-v4-proLeads75%kimi-k2.654%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
deepseek-v4-pro40%kimi-k2.6Leads55%Structured output
deepseek-v4-pro59%kimi-k2.6Leads67%Factual accuracy
deepseek-v4-pro44%kimi-k2.6Leads51%Safety and alignment
deepseek-v4-pro34%kimi-k2.6Leads43%Steerability
deepseek-v4-pro36%kimi-k2.6Leads48%Output consistency
deepseek-v4-proLeads59%kimi-k2.656%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
deepseek-v4-pro32%kimi-k2.6Leads37%Cost efficiency
deepseek-v4-pro30%kimi-k2.6Leads47%Image understanding
deepseek-v4-proNo image inputkimi-k2.6No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
deepseek-v4-pro
99.37%
kimi-k2.6
100%
Average response time
deepseek-v4-pro
21,349.57 ms
kimi-k2.6
12,518.72 ms
P95 API latency
deepseek-v4-pro
60,000 ms
kimi-k2.6
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
deepseek-v4-pro: 100%kimi-k2.6: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
deepseek-v4-pro: 21,275 mskimi-k2.6: 16,670 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
deepseek-v4-pro: 60,000 mskimi-k2.6: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- deepseek-v4-pro has a larger context window.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
- kimi-k2.6 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.