deepseek-v4-pro
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
deepseek-v4-provsgpt-5.6-luna
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-5.6-luna
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
deepseek-v4-pro
text
gpt-5.6-luna
text, image
Vision
deepseek-v4-pro
Not supported
gpt-5.6-lunaBetter fit
Supported
Reasoning
deepseek-v4-pro
Not supported
gpt-5.6-lunaBetter fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
deepseek-v4-pro · leads in 1
46%
Weak
gpt-5.6-luna · leads in 28
79%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
deepseek-v4-pro48%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads89%Logical reasoning
deepseek-v4-pro26%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%Mathematics
deepseek-v4-pro63%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads86%Scientific and technical depth
deepseek-v4-pro57%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads81%Planning and task decomposition
deepseek-v4-pro26%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%
Coding & tools
Code generation
deepseek-v4-pro60%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads78%Debugging and code review
deepseek-v4-pro49%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%Agentic coding
deepseek-v4-pro42%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads82%Tool and function calling
deepseek-v4-pro42%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads85%SQL and query writing
deepseek-v4-pro58%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads86%
Writing & language
Creative writing
deepseek-v4-pro34%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads78%Professional writing
deepseek-v4-pro42%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads82%Conversational quality
deepseek-v4-pro34%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%Multilingual ability
deepseek-v4-pro59%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads77%Translation
deepseek-v4-pro48%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads84%Summarization
deepseek-v4-pro53%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads64%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
deepseek-v4-pro51%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads81%Professional domains
deepseek-v4-pro44%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads80%Information extraction
deepseek-v4-pro51%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads86%Classification and labeling
deepseek-v4-pro49%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads95%Long-context handling
deepseek-v4-proLeads75%gpt-5.6-luna32%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
deepseek-v4-pro40%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads81%Structured output
deepseek-v4-pro59%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads87%Factual accuracy
deepseek-v4-pro44%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads79%Safety and alignment
deepseek-v4-pro34%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads72%Steerability
deepseek-v4-pro36%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads79%Output consistency
deepseek-v4-pro59%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads88%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
deepseek-v4-pro32%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads59%Cost efficiency
deepseek-v4-pro30%gpt-5.6-lunaLeads94%Image understanding
deepseek-v4-proNo image inputgpt-5.6-luna53%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
deepseek-v4-pro
99.37%
gpt-5.6-luna
82.59%
Average response time
deepseek-v4-pro
21,349.57 ms
gpt-5.6-luna
57,896.19 ms
P95 API latency
deepseek-v4-pro
60,000 ms
gpt-5.6-luna
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
deepseek-v4-pro: 100%gpt-5.6-luna: 53.1%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
deepseek-v4-pro: 21,275 msgpt-5.6-luna: 99,082 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
deepseek-v4-pro: 60,000 msgpt-5.6-luna: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-5.6-luna supports image input while the other model does not.
- deepseek-v4-pro recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.