deepseek-v4-pro
Chat comparison
deepseek-v4-provsgemini-3.1-pro
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gemini-3.1-pro
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Reasoning
deepseek-v4-pro
Not supported
gemini-3.1-proBetter fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
deepseek-v4-pro · leads in 1
46%
Weak
gemini-3.1-pro · leads in 28
69%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
deepseek-v4-pro48%gemini-3.1-proLeads73%Logical reasoning
deepseek-v4-pro26%gemini-3.1-proLeads69%Mathematics
deepseek-v4-pro63%gemini-3.1-proLeads76%Scientific and technical depth
deepseek-v4-pro57%gemini-3.1-proLeads76%Planning and task decomposition
deepseek-v4-pro26%gemini-3.1-proLeads67%
Coding & tools
Code generation
deepseek-v4-pro60%gemini-3.1-proLeads64%Debugging and code review
deepseek-v4-pro49%gemini-3.1-proLeads69%Agentic coding
deepseek-v4-pro42%gemini-3.1-proLeads69%Tool and function calling
deepseek-v4-pro42%gemini-3.1-proLeads73%SQL and query writing
deepseek-v4-pro58%gemini-3.1-proLeads73%
Writing & language
Creative writing
deepseek-v4-pro34%gemini-3.1-proLeads61%Professional writing
deepseek-v4-pro42%gemini-3.1-proLeads67%Conversational quality
deepseek-v4-pro34%gemini-3.1-proLeads67%Multilingual ability
deepseek-v4-pro59%gemini-3.1-proLeads98%Translation
deepseek-v4-pro48%gemini-3.1-proLeads78%Summarization
deepseek-v4-pro53%gemini-3.1-proLeads55%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
deepseek-v4-pro51%gemini-3.1-proLeads75%Professional domains
deepseek-v4-pro44%gemini-3.1-proLeads70%Information extraction
deepseek-v4-pro51%gemini-3.1-proLeads72%Classification and labeling
deepseek-v4-pro49%gemini-3.1-proLeads79%Long-context handling
deepseek-v4-proLeads75%gemini-3.1-pro40%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
deepseek-v4-pro40%gemini-3.1-proLeads67%Structured output
deepseek-v4-pro59%gemini-3.1-proLeads77%Factual accuracy
deepseek-v4-pro44%gemini-3.1-proLeads75%Safety and alignment
deepseek-v4-pro34%gemini-3.1-proLeads69%Steerability
deepseek-v4-pro36%gemini-3.1-proLeads62%Output consistency
deepseek-v4-pro59%gemini-3.1-proLeads76%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
deepseek-v4-pro32%gemini-3.1-proLeads47%Cost efficiency
deepseek-v4-pro30%gemini-3.1-proLeads54%Image understanding
deepseek-v4-proNo image inputgemini-3.1-proNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
deepseek-v4-pro
99.37%
gemini-3.1-pro
89.68%
Average response time
deepseek-v4-pro
21,349.57 ms
gemini-3.1-pro
39,780.78 ms
P95 API latency
deepseek-v4-pro
60,000 ms
gemini-3.1-pro
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- deepseek-v4-pro recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.