DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsseed-2.0-mini
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
seed-2.0-mini
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Better fit
400,000 tokens
seed-2.0-mini
250,000 tokens
Reasoning
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Better fit
Supported
seed-2.0-mini
Not supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
62.05%
seed-2.0-mini
100%
Average response time
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
46,536.19 ms
seed-2.0-mini
2,810 ms
P95 API latency
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
60,000 ms
seed-2.0-mini
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: 67.9%seed-2.0-mini: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: 41,575 msseed-2.0-mini: 3,178 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: 60,000 msseed-2.0-mini: 10,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 has a larger context window.
Keep exploring
About DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731About seed-2.0-minianthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs seed-2.0-minianthropic/claude-opus-4-7 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 vs seed-2.0-minianthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs seed-2.0-mini