claude-sonnet-5
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-sonnet-5vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
claude-sonnet-5Better fit
1,000,000 tokens
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
400,000 tokens
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-sonnet-5
96.27%
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
62.12%
Average response time
claude-sonnet-5
17,592.03 ms
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
46,600.6 ms
P95 API latency
claude-sonnet-5
60,000 ms
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-sonnet-5: 99.3%DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: 67.9%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-sonnet-5: 12,028 msDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: 41,575 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-sonnet-5: 30,000 msDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- claude-sonnet-5 has a larger context window.
- claude-sonnet-5 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
Keep exploring
About claude-sonnet-5About DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs claude-sonnet-5anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 vs claude-sonnet-5anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs claude-sonnet-5anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731