deepseek-v4-flash:0731
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
deepseek-v4-flash:0731vsminimax-m3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
minimax-m3
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
deepseek-v4-flash:0731Better fit
1,024,000 tokens
minimax-m3
512,000 tokens
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
deepseek-v4-flash:0731
99.84%
minimax-m3
100%
Average response time
deepseek-v4-flash:0731
10,703.02 ms
minimax-m3
18,868.2 ms
P95 API latency
deepseek-v4-flash:0731
60,000 ms
minimax-m3
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
deepseek-v4-flash:0731: 99.1%minimax-m3: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
deepseek-v4-flash:0731: 10,088 msminimax-m3: 21,794 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
deepseek-v4-flash:0731: 60,000 msminimax-m3: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- deepseek-v4-flash:0731 has a larger context window.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
Keep exploring
About deepseek-v4-flash:0731About minimax-m3anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs deepseek-v4-flash:0731anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs minimax-m3anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 vs deepseek-v4-flash:0731anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 vs minimax-m3anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs deepseek-v4-flash:0731anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs minimax-m3