deepseek-v4-flash:0731
Chat comparison
deepseek-v4-flash:0731vsgpt-5.6-luna
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-5.6-luna
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
deepseek-v4-flash:0731
text
gpt-5.6-luna
text, image
Vision
deepseek-v4-flash:0731
Not supported
gpt-5.6-lunaBetter fit
Supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
deepseek-v4-flash:0731
99.75%
gpt-5.6-luna
84.05%
Average response time
deepseek-v4-flash:0731
10,827.47 ms
gpt-5.6-luna
56,301.41 ms
P95 API latency
deepseek-v4-flash:0731
60,000 ms
gpt-5.6-luna
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- gpt-5.6-luna supports image input while the other model does not.
- deepseek-v4-flash:0731 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.