codestral-latest
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
codestral-latestvsminimax-m3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
minimax-m3
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
codestral-latest
32,000 tokens
minimax-m3Better fit
512,000 tokens
Reasoning
codestral-latest
Not supported
minimax-m3Better fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
codestral-latest · leads in 6
28%
Weak
minimax-m3 · leads in 23
47%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
codestral-latest9%minimax-m3Leads35%Logical reasoning
codestral-latest10%minimax-m3Leads50%Mathematics
codestral-latest25%minimax-m3Leads51%Scientific and technical depth
codestral-latest15%minimax-m3Leads42%Planning and task decomposition
codestral-latest11%minimax-m3Leads52%
Coding & tools
Code generation
codestral-latestLeads85%minimax-m337%Debugging and code review
codestral-latestLeads60%minimax-m347%Agentic coding
codestral-latest44%minimax-m3Leads55%Tool and function calling
codestral-latest33%minimax-m3Leads51%SQL and query writing
codestral-latestLeads60%minimax-m348%
Writing & language
Creative writing
codestral-latest7%minimax-m3Leads38%Professional writing
codestral-latest8%minimax-m3Leads40%Conversational quality
codestral-latest7%minimax-m3Leads43%Multilingual ability
codestral-latest32%minimax-m3Leads65%Translation
codestral-latest11%minimax-m3Leads50%Summarization
codestral-latest7%minimax-m3Leads48%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
codestral-latest13%minimax-m3Leads50%Professional domains
codestral-latest5%minimax-m3Leads43%Information extraction
codestral-latest16%minimax-m3Leads51%Classification and labeling
codestral-latest15%minimax-m3Leads51%Long-context handling
codestral-latest15%minimax-m3Leads59%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
codestral-latest21%minimax-m3Leads46%Structured output
codestral-latest44%minimax-m3Leads51%Factual accuracy
codestral-latest17%minimax-m3Leads37%Safety and alignment
codestral-latest14%minimax-m3Leads35%Steerability
codestral-latest14%minimax-m3Leads44%Output consistency
codestral-latestLeads52%minimax-m350%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
codestral-latestLeads85%minimax-m340%Cost efficiency
codestral-latestLeads82%minimax-m352%Image understanding
codestral-latestNo image inputminimax-m3No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
codestral-latest
98.36%
minimax-m3
99.29%
Average response time
codestral-latest
3,439.06 ms
minimax-m3
22,425.83 ms
P95 API latency
codestral-latest
10,000 ms
minimax-m3
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
codestral-latest: 99.3%minimax-m3: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
codestral-latest: 4,108 msminimax-m3: 27,175 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
codestral-latest: 10,000 msminimax-m3: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- minimax-m3 has a larger context window.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
- codestral-latest recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.