codestral-latest
Input $0.01 USD · Output $0.02 USD / 1M tokens
chat comparison
codestral-latestvsgpt-oss:20b
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-oss:20b
Input $0.04 USD · Output $0.06 USD / 1M tokens
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
codestral-latest
32,000 tokens
gpt-oss:20bBetter fit
128,000 tokens
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
codestral-latest
98.63%
gpt-oss:20b
98.89%
Average response time
codestral-latest
3,325.72 ms
gpt-oss:20b
7,324.69 ms
P95 API latency
codestral-latest
30,000 ms
gpt-oss:20b
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
codestral-latest: 96.8%gpt-oss:20b: 99.1%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
codestral-latest: 2,178 msgpt-oss:20b: 6,991 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
codestral-latest: 10,000 msgpt-oss:20b: 30,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Try the same request volume against both public price lists.
Cost calculator
Adjust the volume to see an instant estimate at the current public price.
01M
Input estimate
$0.0001
Output estimate
$0.00005
Estimated total
$0.00015
Cost calculator
Adjust the volume to see an instant estimate at the current public price.
01M
Input estimate
$0.0004
Output estimate
$0.00015
Estimated total
$0.00055
Quick take
- gpt-oss:20b has a larger context window.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
- codestral-latest recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.