LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Mistral AI logo

codestral-latestvsgemini-3.6-flash-high

Google logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

codestral-latest

Checking current pricing…

gemini-3.6-flash-high

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

codestral-latest

text

gemini-3.6-flash-high

text, json

Reasoning

codestral-latest

Not supported

gemini-3.6-flash-highBetter fit

Supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

codestral-latest · leads in 1

28%

Weak

gemini-3.6-flash-high · leads in 28

71%

Moderate

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    codestral-latest9%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads73%
  • Logical reasoning

    codestral-latest10%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads70%
  • Mathematics

    codestral-latest25%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads73%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    codestral-latest15%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads68%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    codestral-latest11%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads67%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    codestral-latestLeads85%
    gemini-3.6-flash-high65%
  • Debugging and code review

    codestral-latest60%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads69%
  • Agentic coding

    codestral-latest44%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads69%
  • Tool and function calling

    codestral-latest33%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads76%
  • SQL and query writing

    codestral-latest60%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads73%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    codestral-latest7%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads56%
  • Professional writing

    codestral-latest8%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads64%
  • Conversational quality

    codestral-latest7%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads65%
  • Multilingual ability

    codestral-latest32%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads99%
  • Translation

    codestral-latest11%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads77%
  • Summarization

    codestral-latest7%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads53%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    codestral-latest13%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads77%
  • Professional domains

    codestral-latest5%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads65%
  • Information extraction

    codestral-latest16%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads78%
  • Classification and labeling

    codestral-latest15%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads85%
  • Long-context handling

    codestral-latest15%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads37%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    codestral-latest21%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads70%
  • Structured output

    codestral-latest44%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads87%
  • Factual accuracy

    codestral-latest17%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads73%
  • Safety and alignment

    codestral-latest14%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads69%
  • Steerability

    codestral-latest14%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads62%
  • Output consistency

    codestral-latest52%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads77%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    codestral-latest85%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads91%
  • Cost efficiency

    codestral-latest82%
    gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads84%
  • Image understanding

    codestral-latestNo image input
    gemini-3.6-flash-highNo image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

codestral-latest

98.36%

gemini-3.6-flash-high

99.2%

Average response time

codestral-latest

3,439.06 ms

gemini-3.6-flash-high

9,446.51 ms

P95 API latency

codestral-latest

10,000 ms

gemini-3.6-flash-high

30,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

codestral-latest: 99.3%gemini-3.6-flash-high: 85.7%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

codestral-latest: 4,108 msgemini-3.6-flash-high: 24,682 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

codestral-latest: 10,000 msgemini-3.6-flash-high: 60,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
  • codestral-latest recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring