codestral-latest
Chat comparison
codestral-latestvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
codestral-latest
32,000 tokens
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Better fit
400,000 tokens
Reasoning
codestral-latest
Not supported
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Better fit
Supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
codestral-latest
98.15%
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
62.12%
Average response time
codestral-latest
3,540.32 ms
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
46,600.6 ms
P95 API latency
codestral-latest
10,000 ms
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 has a larger context window.
- codestral-latest recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- codestral-latest recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.