LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

DeepSeek logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6

Checking current pricing…

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6

text, image, json

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

text

Vision

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Better fit

Supported

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

Not supported

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6

100%

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

62.12%

Average response time

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6

2,371.43 ms

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

46,600.6 ms

P95 API latency

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6

5,000 ms

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6: 100%DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: 67.9%
17 Sept30 Sept

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6: 2,424 msDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: 41,575 ms
17 Sept30 Sept

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6: 5,000 msDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: 60,000 ms
17 Sept30 Sept

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 supports image input while the other model does not.

Keep exploring