LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Anthropic logo

claude-sonnet-4-6vskimi-k2.7-code

Moonshot AI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

claude-sonnet-4-6

Checking current pricing…

kimi-k2.7-code

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

claude-sonnet-4-6Better fit

1,000,000 tokens

kimi-k2.7-code

256,000 tokens

Input formats

claude-sonnet-4-6

text, image

kimi-k2.7-code

text

Vision

claude-sonnet-4-6Better fit

Supported

kimi-k2.7-code

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

claude-sonnet-4-6 · leads in 27

84%

Strong

kimi-k2.7-code · leads in 2

53%

Moderate

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads82%
    kimi-k2.7-code37%
  • Logical reasoning

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads84%
    kimi-k2.7-code59%
  • Mathematics

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads82%
    kimi-k2.7-code68%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads81%
    kimi-k2.7-code56%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads84%
    kimi-k2.7-code62%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    claude-sonnet-4-679%
    kimi-k2.7-codeLeads87%
  • Debugging and code review

    claude-sonnet-4-686%
    kimi-k2.7-codeLeads88%
  • Agentic coding

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads89%
    kimi-k2.7-code81%
  • Tool and function calling

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads86%
    kimi-k2.7-code58%
  • SQL and query writing

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads86%
    kimi-k2.7-code84%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads84%
    kimi-k2.7-code36%
  • Professional writing

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads89%
    kimi-k2.7-code39%
  • Conversational quality

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads88%
    kimi-k2.7-code41%
  • Multilingual ability

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads73%
    kimi-k2.7-code55%
  • Translation

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads86%
    kimi-k2.7-code48%
  • Summarization

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads89%
    kimi-k2.7-code48%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads87%
    kimi-k2.7-code59%
  • Professional domains

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads85%
    kimi-k2.7-code43%
  • Information extraction

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads90%
    kimi-k2.7-code52%
  • Classification and labeling

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads91%
    kimi-k2.7-code44%
  • Long-context handling

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads91%
    kimi-k2.7-code52%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads88%
    kimi-k2.7-code50%
  • Structured output

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads93%
    kimi-k2.7-code59%
  • Factual accuracy

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads92%
    kimi-k2.7-code44%
  • Safety and alignment

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads87%
    kimi-k2.7-code39%
  • Steerability

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads89%
    kimi-k2.7-code45%
  • Output consistency

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads97%
    kimi-k2.7-code53%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads40%
    kimi-k2.7-code30%
  • Cost efficiency

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads68%
    kimi-k2.7-code34%
  • Image understanding

    claude-sonnet-4-662%
    kimi-k2.7-codeNo image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

claude-sonnet-4-6

97.48%

kimi-k2.7-code

99.83%

Average response time

claude-sonnet-4-6

17,871.29 ms

kimi-k2.7-code

6,571.81 ms

P95 API latency

claude-sonnet-4-6

60,000 ms

kimi-k2.7-code

30,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

claude-sonnet-4-6: 100%kimi-k2.7-code: 100%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-sonnet-4-6: 4,447 mskimi-k2.7-code: 1,138 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-sonnet-4-6: 5,000 mskimi-k2.7-code: 2,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • claude-sonnet-4-6 has a larger context window.
  • claude-sonnet-4-6 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • kimi-k2.7-code recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • kimi-k2.7-code recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring