LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Anthropic logo

claude-sonnet-4-6vsdeepseek-v4-pro

DeepSeek logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

claude-sonnet-4-6

Checking current pricing…

deepseek-v4-pro

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

claude-sonnet-4-6

text, image

deepseek-v4-pro

text

Vision

claude-sonnet-4-6Better fit

Supported

deepseek-v4-pro

Not supported

Reasoning

claude-sonnet-4-6Better fit

Supported

deepseek-v4-pro

Not supported

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

claude-sonnet-4-6

94.62%

deepseek-v4-pro

99.21%

Average response time

claude-sonnet-4-6

21,537.81 ms

deepseek-v4-pro

11,686.76 ms

P95 API latency

claude-sonnet-4-6

60,000 ms

deepseek-v4-pro

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

claude-sonnet-4-6: 99.4%deepseek-v4-pro: 100%
12 Sept30 Sept

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-sonnet-4-6: 10,849 msdeepseek-v4-pro: 621 ms
12 Sept30 Sept

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-sonnet-4-6: 60,000 msdeepseek-v4-pro: 2,000 ms
12 Sept30 Sept

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • claude-sonnet-4-6 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • deepseek-v4-pro recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.

Keep exploring