LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Anthropic logo

claude-sonnet-4-6vsseed-2.0-mini

ByteDance logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

claude-sonnet-4-6

Checking current pricing…

seed-2.0-mini

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

claude-sonnet-4-6Better fit

1,000,000 tokens

seed-2.0-mini

250,000 tokens

Input formats

claude-sonnet-4-6

text, image

seed-2.0-mini

text

Vision

claude-sonnet-4-6Better fit

Supported

seed-2.0-mini

Not supported

Reasoning

claude-sonnet-4-6Better fit

Supported

seed-2.0-mini

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

claude-sonnet-4-6 · leads in 28

84%

Strong

seed-2.0-mini · leads in 1

21%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads82%
    seed-2.0-mini14%
  • Logical reasoning

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads84%
    seed-2.0-mini8%
  • Mathematics

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads82%
    seed-2.0-mini12%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads81%
    seed-2.0-mini11%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads84%
    seed-2.0-mini11%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads79%
    seed-2.0-mini15%
  • Debugging and code review

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads86%
    seed-2.0-mini13%
  • Agentic coding

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads89%
    seed-2.0-mini21%
  • Tool and function calling

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads86%
    seed-2.0-mini23%
  • SQL and query writing

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads86%
    seed-2.0-mini16%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads84%
    seed-2.0-mini12%
  • Professional writing

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads89%
    seed-2.0-mini15%
  • Conversational quality

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads88%
    seed-2.0-mini10%
  • Multilingual ability

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads73%
    seed-2.0-mini16%
  • Translation

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads86%
    seed-2.0-mini13%
  • Summarization

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads89%
    seed-2.0-mini19%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads87%
    seed-2.0-mini16%
  • Professional domains

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads85%
    seed-2.0-mini12%
  • Information extraction

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads90%
    seed-2.0-mini24%
  • Classification and labeling

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads91%
    seed-2.0-mini23%
  • Long-context handling

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads91%
    seed-2.0-mini33%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads88%
    seed-2.0-mini17%
  • Structured output

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads93%
    seed-2.0-mini38%
  • Factual accuracy

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads92%
    seed-2.0-mini16%
  • Safety and alignment

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads87%
    seed-2.0-mini17%
  • Steerability

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads89%
    seed-2.0-mini14%
  • Output consistency

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads97%
    seed-2.0-mini52%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    claude-sonnet-4-640%
    seed-2.0-miniLeads68%
  • Cost efficiency

    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads68%
    seed-2.0-mini48%
  • Image understanding

    claude-sonnet-4-662%
    seed-2.0-miniNo image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

claude-sonnet-4-6

97.48%

seed-2.0-mini

100%

Average response time

claude-sonnet-4-6

17,871.29 ms

seed-2.0-mini

6,796.87 ms

P95 API latency

claude-sonnet-4-6

60,000 ms

seed-2.0-mini

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

claude-sonnet-4-6: 100%seed-2.0-mini: 100%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-sonnet-4-6: 4,447 msseed-2.0-mini: 5,772 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-sonnet-4-6: 5,000 msseed-2.0-mini: 60,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • claude-sonnet-4-6 has a larger context window.
  • claude-sonnet-4-6 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • seed-2.0-mini recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.

Keep exploring