claude-opus-5
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-opus-5vskimi-k2.6
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k2.6
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
claude-opus-5Better fit
1,000,000 tokens
kimi-k2.6
262,000 tokens
Input formats
claude-opus-5
text, image
kimi-k2.6
text, json
Vision
claude-opus-5Better fit
Supported
kimi-k2.6
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-opus-5 · leads in 27
83%
Strong
kimi-k2.6 · leads in 2
54%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-opus-5Leads86%kimi-k2.647%Logical reasoning
claude-opus-5Leads88%kimi-k2.660%Mathematics
claude-opus-5Leads87%kimi-k2.667%Scientific and technical depth
claude-opus-5Leads91%kimi-k2.653%Planning and task decomposition
claude-opus-5Leads89%kimi-k2.659%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-opus-5Leads79%kimi-k2.650%Debugging and code review
claude-opus-5Leads88%kimi-k2.658%Agentic coding
claude-opus-5Leads90%kimi-k2.660%Tool and function calling
claude-opus-5Leads88%kimi-k2.656%SQL and query writing
claude-opus-5Leads86%kimi-k2.659%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-opus-5Leads88%kimi-k2.644%Professional writing
claude-opus-5Leads91%kimi-k2.649%Conversational quality
claude-opus-5Leads90%kimi-k2.651%Multilingual ability
claude-opus-5Leads76%kimi-k2.665%Translation
claude-opus-5Leads89%kimi-k2.657%Summarization
claude-opus-5Leads92%kimi-k2.654%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-opus-5Leads90%kimi-k2.662%Professional domains
claude-opus-5Leads92%kimi-k2.650%Information extraction
claude-opus-5Leads88%kimi-k2.664%Classification and labeling
claude-opus-5Leads82%kimi-k2.655%Long-context handling
claude-opus-5Leads93%kimi-k2.654%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-opus-5Leads88%kimi-k2.655%Structured output
claude-opus-5Leads90%kimi-k2.667%Factual accuracy
claude-opus-5Leads93%kimi-k2.651%Safety and alignment
claude-opus-5Leads91%kimi-k2.643%Steerability
claude-opus-5Leads92%kimi-k2.648%Output consistency
claude-opus-5Leads92%kimi-k2.656%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-opus-512%kimi-k2.6Leads37%Cost efficiency
claude-opus-521%kimi-k2.6Leads47%Image understanding
claude-opus-581%kimi-k2.6No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-opus-5
99.22%
kimi-k2.6
100%
Average response time
claude-opus-5
9,181.89 ms
kimi-k2.6
12,518.72 ms
P95 API latency
claude-opus-5
30,000 ms
kimi-k2.6
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5: 100%kimi-k2.6: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5: 5,515 mskimi-k2.6: 16,670 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5: 10,000 mskimi-k2.6: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- claude-opus-5 has a larger context window.
- claude-opus-5 supports image input while the other model does not.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.