claude-haiku-5-5
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-haiku-5-5vsglm-5.3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
glm-5.3
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
claude-haiku-5-5
text, image
glm-5.3
text
Vision
claude-haiku-5-5Better fit
Supported
glm-5.3
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-haiku-5-5 · leads in 25
68%
Moderate
glm-5.3 · leads in 4
58%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-haiku-5-5Leads61%glm-5.353%Logical reasoning
claude-haiku-5-5Leads65%glm-5.361%Mathematics
claude-haiku-5-560%glm-5.3Leads66%Scientific and technical depth
claude-haiku-5-555%glm-5.3Leads59%Planning and task decomposition
claude-haiku-5-5Leads67%glm-5.361%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-haiku-5-5Leads56%glm-5.350%Debugging and code review
claude-haiku-5-5Leads64%glm-5.361%Agentic coding
claude-haiku-5-5Leads70%glm-5.364%Tool and function calling
claude-haiku-5-5Leads71%glm-5.357%SQL and query writing
claude-haiku-5-564%glm-5.3Leads65%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-haiku-5-5Leads63%glm-5.347%Professional writing
claude-haiku-5-5Leads72%glm-5.354%Conversational quality
claude-haiku-5-5Leads71%glm-5.351%Multilingual ability
claude-haiku-5-558%glm-5.3Leads86%Translation
claude-haiku-5-5Leads66%glm-5.364%Summarization
claude-haiku-5-5Leads72%glm-5.360%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-haiku-5-5Leads68%glm-5.364%Professional domains
claude-haiku-5-5Leads66%glm-5.356%Information extraction
claude-haiku-5-5Leads72%glm-5.362%Classification and labeling
claude-haiku-5-5Leads73%glm-5.363%Long-context handling
claude-haiku-5-5Leads83%glm-5.375%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-haiku-5-5Leads71%glm-5.355%Structured output
claude-haiku-5-5Leads79%glm-5.360%Factual accuracy
claude-haiku-5-5Leads76%glm-5.353%Safety and alignment
claude-haiku-5-5Leads76%glm-5.347%Steerability
claude-haiku-5-5Leads75%glm-5.353%Output consistency
claude-haiku-5-5Leads83%glm-5.360%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-haiku-5-5Leads76%glm-5.334%Cost efficiency
claude-haiku-5-5Leads68%glm-5.336%Image understanding
claude-haiku-5-538%glm-5.3No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-haiku-5-5
98.04%
glm-5.3
98.84%
Average response time
claude-haiku-5-5
18,800.08 ms
glm-5.3
20,395.48 ms
P95 API latency
claude-haiku-5-5
60,000 ms
glm-5.3
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-haiku-5-5: 100%glm-5.3: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-haiku-5-5: 4,407 msglm-5.3: 5,597 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-haiku-5-5: 10,000 msglm-5.3: 10,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- claude-haiku-5-5 supports image input while the other model does not.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.