claude-haiku-4-5
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-haiku-4-5vskimi-k2.6
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k2.6
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
claude-haiku-4-5
200,000 tokens
kimi-k2.6Better fit
262,000 tokens
Input formats
claude-haiku-4-5
text
kimi-k2.6
text, json
Reasoning
claude-haiku-4-5
Not supported
kimi-k2.6Better fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-haiku-4-5 · leads in 10
48%
Weak
kimi-k2.6 · leads in 18
54%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-haiku-4-544%kimi-k2.6Leads47%Logical reasoning
claude-haiku-4-523%kimi-k2.6Leads60%Mathematics
claude-haiku-4-529%kimi-k2.6Leads67%Scientific and technical depth
claude-haiku-4-526%kimi-k2.6Leads53%Planning and task decomposition
claude-haiku-4-525%kimi-k2.6Leads59%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-haiku-4-537%kimi-k2.6Leads50%Debugging and code review
claude-haiku-4-531%kimi-k2.6Leads58%Agentic coding
claude-haiku-4-532%kimi-k2.6Leads60%Tool and function calling
claude-haiku-4-549%kimi-k2.6Leads56%SQL and query writing
claude-haiku-4-536%kimi-k2.6Leads59%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-haiku-4-5Leads45%kimi-k2.644%Professional writing
claude-haiku-4-5Leads56%kimi-k2.649%Conversational quality
claude-haiku-4-5Leads53%kimi-k2.651%Multilingual ability
claude-haiku-4-544%kimi-k2.6Leads65%Translation
claude-haiku-4-545%kimi-k2.6Leads57%Summarization
claude-haiku-4-543%kimi-k2.6Leads54%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-haiku-4-533%kimi-k2.6Leads62%Professional domains
claude-haiku-4-539%kimi-k2.6Leads50%Information extraction
claude-haiku-4-550%kimi-k2.6Leads64%Classification and labeling
claude-haiku-4-550%kimi-k2.6Leads55%Long-context handling
claude-haiku-4-541%kimi-k2.6Leads54%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-haiku-4-555%kimi-k2.655%Structured output
claude-haiku-4-5Leads70%kimi-k2.667%Factual accuracy
claude-haiku-4-5Leads63%kimi-k2.651%Safety and alignment
claude-haiku-4-5Leads68%kimi-k2.643%Steerability
claude-haiku-4-5Leads59%kimi-k2.648%Output consistency
claude-haiku-4-5Leads86%kimi-k2.656%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-haiku-4-5Leads84%kimi-k2.637%Cost efficiency
claude-haiku-4-5Leads68%kimi-k2.647%Image understanding
claude-haiku-4-5No image inputkimi-k2.6No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-haiku-4-5
96.36%
kimi-k2.6
100%
Average response time
claude-haiku-4-5
5,956.97 ms
kimi-k2.6
12,518.72 ms
P95 API latency
claude-haiku-4-5
30,000 ms
kimi-k2.6
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-haiku-4-5: 100%kimi-k2.6: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-haiku-4-5: 3,702 mskimi-k2.6: 16,670 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-haiku-4-5: 30,000 mskimi-k2.6: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- kimi-k2.6 has a larger context window.
- kimi-k2.6 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.