claude-haiku-4-5
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-haiku-4-5vsglm-5.2
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
glm-5.2
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
claude-haiku-4-5
200,000 tokens
glm-5.2Better fit
976,000 tokens
Reasoning
claude-haiku-4-5
Not supported
glm-5.2Better fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-haiku-4-5 · leads in 11
48%
Weak
glm-5.2 · leads in 18
56%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-haiku-4-544%glm-5.2Leads50%Logical reasoning
claude-haiku-4-523%glm-5.2Leads57%Mathematics
claude-haiku-4-529%glm-5.2Leads62%Scientific and technical depth
claude-haiku-4-526%glm-5.2Leads56%Planning and task decomposition
claude-haiku-4-525%glm-5.2Leads57%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-haiku-4-537%glm-5.2Leads47%Debugging and code review
claude-haiku-4-531%glm-5.2Leads58%Agentic coding
claude-haiku-4-532%glm-5.2Leads61%Tool and function calling
claude-haiku-4-549%glm-5.2Leads55%SQL and query writing
claude-haiku-4-536%glm-5.2Leads63%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-haiku-4-5Leads45%glm-5.244%Professional writing
claude-haiku-4-5Leads56%glm-5.251%Conversational quality
claude-haiku-4-5Leads53%glm-5.249%Multilingual ability
claude-haiku-4-544%glm-5.2Leads84%Translation
claude-haiku-4-545%glm-5.2Leads61%Summarization
claude-haiku-4-543%glm-5.2Leads57%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-haiku-4-533%glm-5.2Leads61%Professional domains
claude-haiku-4-539%glm-5.2Leads53%Information extraction
claude-haiku-4-550%glm-5.2Leads61%Classification and labeling
claude-haiku-4-550%glm-5.2Leads61%Long-context handling
claude-haiku-4-541%glm-5.2Leads67%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-haiku-4-5Leads55%glm-5.253%Structured output
claude-haiku-4-5Leads70%glm-5.260%Factual accuracy
claude-haiku-4-5Leads63%glm-5.250%Safety and alignment
claude-haiku-4-5Leads68%glm-5.245%Steerability
claude-haiku-4-5Leads59%glm-5.249%Output consistency
claude-haiku-4-5Leads86%glm-5.260%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-haiku-4-5Leads84%glm-5.237%Cost efficiency
claude-haiku-4-5Leads68%glm-5.243%Image understanding
claude-haiku-4-5No image inputglm-5.2No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-haiku-4-5
96.36%
glm-5.2
99.94%
Average response time
claude-haiku-4-5
5,956.97 ms
glm-5.2
2,766.68 ms
P95 API latency
claude-haiku-4-5
30,000 ms
glm-5.2
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-haiku-4-5: 100%glm-5.2: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-haiku-4-5: 3,702 msglm-5.2: 666 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-haiku-4-5: 30,000 msglm-5.2: 5,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- glm-5.2 has a larger context window.
- glm-5.2 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- glm-5.2 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.