claude-fable-5-1
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-fable-5-1vsgpt-6.1-sol
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-6.1-sol
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
claude-fable-5-1
text, image
gpt-6.1-sol
text, image, json
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-fable-5-1 · leads in 24
93%
Strong
gpt-6.1-sol · leads in 4
86%
Strong
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol96%Logical reasoning
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol89%Mathematics
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol95%Scientific and technical depth
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol90%Planning and task decomposition
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol88%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-fable-5-1Leads89%gpt-6.1-sol86%Debugging and code review
claude-fable-5-1Leads99%gpt-6.1-sol92%Agentic coding
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol93%Tool and function calling
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol90%SQL and query writing
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol94%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol82%Professional writing
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol87%Conversational quality
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol88%Multilingual ability
claude-fable-5-186%gpt-6.1-sol86%Translation
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol92%Summarization
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol87%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol95%Professional domains
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol89%Information extraction
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol96%Classification and labeling
claude-fable-5-1100%gpt-6.1-sol100%Long-context handling
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol89%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol88%Structured output
claude-fable-5-198%gpt-6.1-solLeads99%Factual accuracy
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol86%Safety and alignment
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol79%Steerability
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol84%Output consistency
claude-fable-5-183%gpt-6.1-solLeads97%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-fable-5-110%gpt-6.1-solLeads40%Cost efficiency
claude-fable-5-116%gpt-6.1-solLeads49%Image understanding
claude-fable-5-1Leads100%gpt-6.1-sol68%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-fable-5-1
94.82%
gpt-6.1-sol
98.17%
Average response time
claude-fable-5-1
6,647.67 ms
gpt-6.1-sol
18,340.6 ms
P95 API latency
claude-fable-5-1
30,000 ms
gpt-6.1-sol
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5-1: 87.5%gpt-6.1-sol: 91.7%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5-1: 3,224 msgpt-6.1-sol: 24,176 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5-1: 10,000 msgpt-6.1-sol: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-6.1-sol recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- claude-fable-5-1 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.