claude-fable-5
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-fable-5vsgpt-6-astra
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-6-astra
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
claude-fable-5
text
gpt-6-astra
text, image
Vision
claude-fable-5
Not supported
gpt-6-astraBetter fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-fable-5 · leads in 27
91%
Strong
gpt-6-astra · leads in 2
76%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-fable-5Leads98%gpt-6-astra87%Logical reasoning
claude-fable-5Leads99%gpt-6-astra81%Mathematics
claude-fable-5Leads98%gpt-6-astra83%Scientific and technical depth
claude-fable-5Leads99%gpt-6-astra81%Planning and task decomposition
claude-fable-5Leads99%gpt-6-astra81%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-fable-5Leads88%gpt-6-astra75%Debugging and code review
claude-fable-5Leads97%gpt-6-astra82%Agentic coding
claude-fable-5Leads98%gpt-6-astra83%Tool and function calling
claude-fable-5Leads98%gpt-6-astra82%SQL and query writing
claude-fable-5Leads98%gpt-6-astra82%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-fable-5Leads98%gpt-6-astra77%Professional writing
claude-fable-5Leads99%gpt-6-astra79%Conversational quality
claude-fable-5Leads98%gpt-6-astra80%Multilingual ability
claude-fable-5Leads82%gpt-6-astra76%Translation
claude-fable-5Leads97%gpt-6-astra81%Summarization
claude-fable-5Leads98%gpt-6-astra77%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-fable-5Leads96%gpt-6-astra84%Professional domains
claude-fable-5Leads98%gpt-6-astra81%Information extraction
claude-fable-5Leads97%gpt-6-astra82%Classification and labeling
claude-fable-5Leads97%gpt-6-astra86%Long-context handling
claude-fable-5Leads99%gpt-6-astra84%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-fable-5Leads99%gpt-6-astra78%Structured output
claude-fable-5Leads98%gpt-6-astra84%Factual accuracy
claude-fable-5Leads99%gpt-6-astra75%Safety and alignment
claude-fable-5Leads99%gpt-6-astra72%Steerability
claude-fable-5Leads99%gpt-6-astra77%Output consistency
claude-fable-5Leads84%gpt-6-astra80%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-fable-511%gpt-6-astraLeads30%Cost efficiency
claude-fable-515%gpt-6-astraLeads28%Image understanding
claude-fable-5No image inputgpt-6-astra61%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-fable-5
98.83%
gpt-6-astra
95.38%
Average response time
claude-fable-5
10,866.7 ms
gpt-6-astra
13,054.86 ms
P95 API latency
claude-fable-5
60,000 ms
gpt-6-astra
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5: 100%gpt-6-astra: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5: 10,131 msgpt-6-astra: 4,296 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5: 30,000 msgpt-6-astra: 10,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-6-astra supports image input while the other model does not.
- claude-fable-5 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.