claude-fable-5
Input $4.50 USD · Output $30.00 USD / 1M tokens
chat comparison
claude-fable-5vsdeepseek-v4-pro
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
deepseek-v4-pro
Input $0.37 USD · Output $0.74 USD / 1M tokens
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Reasoning
claude-fable-5Better fit
Supported
deepseek-v4-pro
Not supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-fable-5
73.17%
deepseek-v4-pro
97.67%
Average response time
claude-fable-5
44,345.85 ms
deepseek-v4-pro
6,982.49 ms
P95 API latency
claude-fable-5
60,000 ms
deepseek-v4-pro
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5: 90.9%deepseek-v4-pro: 98.4%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5: 25,214 msdeepseek-v4-pro: 10,971 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5: 60,000 msdeepseek-v4-pro: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Try the same request volume against both public price lists.
Cost calculator
Adjust the volume to see an instant estimate at the current public price.
01M
Input estimate
$0.045
Output estimate
$0.075
Estimated total
$0.12
Cost calculator
Adjust the volume to see an instant estimate at the current public price.
01M
Input estimate
$0.0037
Output estimate
$0.00185
Estimated total
$0.00555
Quick take
- deepseek-v4-pro recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- deepseek-v4-pro recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.