LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5vsminimax-m3

MiniMax logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5

text, image, json

minimax-m3

text

Vision

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5Better fit

Supported

minimax-m3

Not supported

Reasoning

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5

Not supported

minimax-m3Better fit

Supported

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5

99.9%

minimax-m3

100%

Average response time

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5

9,660.43 ms

minimax-m3

18,868.2 ms

P95 API latency

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5

60,000 ms

minimax-m3

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: 100%minimax-m3: 100%
24 Sept30 Sept

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: 1,018 msminimax-m3: 21,794 ms
24 Sept30 Sept

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: 2,000 msminimax-m3: 60,000 ms
24 Sept30 Sept

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.

Keep exploring