LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8vsglm-5.3

Z.ai logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

text, image, json

glm-5.3

text

Vision

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Better fit

Supported

glm-5.3

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 · leads in 25

84%

Strong

glm-5.3 · leads in 4

58%

Moderate

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads88%
    glm-5.353%
  • Logical reasoning

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    glm-5.361%
  • Mathematics

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads88%
    glm-5.366%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads93%
    glm-5.359%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads90%
    glm-5.361%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads82%
    glm-5.350%
  • Debugging and code review

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads90%
    glm-5.361%
  • Agentic coding

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads90%
    glm-5.364%
  • Tool and function calling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    glm-5.357%
  • SQL and query writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads88%
    glm-5.365%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    glm-5.347%
  • Professional writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads93%
    glm-5.354%
  • Conversational quality

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    glm-5.351%
  • Multilingual ability

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-873%
    glm-5.3Leads86%
  • Translation

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    glm-5.364%
  • Summarization

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads84%
    glm-5.360%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    glm-5.364%
  • Professional domains

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads94%
    glm-5.356%
  • Information extraction

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    glm-5.362%
  • Classification and labeling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads84%
    glm-5.363%
  • Long-context handling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-858%
    glm-5.3Leads75%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads93%
    glm-5.355%
  • Structured output

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads99%
    glm-5.360%
  • Factual accuracy

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads98%
    glm-5.353%
  • Safety and alignment

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads96%
    glm-5.347%
  • Steerability

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads95%
    glm-5.353%
  • Output consistency

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Leads97%
    glm-5.360%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-811%
    glm-5.3Leads34%
  • Cost efficiency

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-818%
    glm-5.3Leads36%
  • Image understanding

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-879%
    glm-5.3No image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

97.2%

glm-5.3

98.84%

Average response time

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

7,987.25 ms

glm-5.3

20,395.48 ms

P95 API latency

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

30,000 ms

glm-5.3

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8: 97%glm-5.3: 100%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8: 8,328 msglm-5.3: 5,597 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8: 30,000 msglm-5.3: 10,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • glm-5.3 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring