LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7vsclaude-opus-4-8

Anthropic logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

Checking current pricing…

claude-opus-4-8

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

text, image, json

claude-opus-4-8

text, image

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 · leads in 11

83%

Strong

claude-opus-4-8 · leads in 13

85%

Strong

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-7Leads87%
    claude-opus-4-886%
  • Logical reasoning

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-789%
    claude-opus-4-889%
  • Mathematics

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-787%
    claude-opus-4-8Leads88%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-792%
    claude-opus-4-892%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-789%
    claude-opus-4-889%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-7Leads81%
    claude-opus-4-880%
  • Debugging and code review

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-789%
    claude-opus-4-889%
  • Agentic coding

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-788%
    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
  • Tool and function calling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-7Leads91%
    claude-opus-4-889%
  • SQL and query writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-787%
    claude-opus-4-8Leads88%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-788%
    claude-opus-4-888%
  • Professional writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-792%
    claude-opus-4-892%
  • Conversational quality

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-7Leads91%
    claude-opus-4-890%
  • Multilingual ability

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-772%
    claude-opus-4-8Leads77%
  • Translation

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-788%
    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
  • Summarization

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-782%
    claude-opus-4-8Leads93%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-788%
    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
  • Professional domains

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-7Leads93%
    claude-opus-4-892%
  • Information extraction

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-790%
    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
  • Classification and labeling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-783%
    claude-opus-4-8Leads85%
  • Long-context handling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-756%
    claude-opus-4-8Leads94%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-7Leads92%
    claude-opus-4-889%
  • Structured output

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-7Leads98%
    claude-opus-4-892%
  • Factual accuracy

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-7Leads97%
    claude-opus-4-895%
  • Safety and alignment

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-7Leads95%
    claude-opus-4-891%
  • Steerability

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-7Leads94%
    claude-opus-4-892%
  • Output consistency

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-7Leads96%
    claude-opus-4-895%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-711%
    claude-opus-4-8Leads13%
  • Cost efficiency

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-717%
    claude-opus-4-8Leads26%
  • Image understanding

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-775%
    claude-opus-4-8Leads78%

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

97.14%

claude-opus-4-8

96.77%

Average response time

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

7,419.7 ms

claude-opus-4-8

13,573.98 ms

P95 API latency

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

30,000 ms

claude-opus-4-8

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7: 96.9%claude-opus-4-8: 100%
21 Sept19 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7: 7,629 msclaude-opus-4-8: 2,396 ms
21 Sept19 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7: 30,000 msclaude-opus-4-8: 10,000 ms
21 Sept19 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring