LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7vsclaude-fable-5

Anthropic logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

Checking current pricing…

claude-fable-5

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

text, image, json

claude-fable-5

text

Vision

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7Better fit

Supported

claude-fable-5

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 · leads in 2

83%

Strong

claude-fable-5 · leads in 25

91%

Strong

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-787%
    claude-fable-5Leads98%
  • Logical reasoning

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-789%
    claude-fable-5Leads99%
  • Mathematics

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-787%
    claude-fable-5Leads98%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-792%
    claude-fable-5Leads99%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-789%
    claude-fable-5Leads99%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-781%
    claude-fable-5Leads88%
  • Debugging and code review

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-789%
    claude-fable-5Leads97%
  • Agentic coding

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-788%
    claude-fable-5Leads98%
  • Tool and function calling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-791%
    claude-fable-5Leads98%
  • SQL and query writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-787%
    claude-fable-5Leads98%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-788%
    claude-fable-5Leads98%
  • Professional writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-792%
    claude-fable-5Leads99%
  • Conversational quality

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-791%
    claude-fable-5Leads98%
  • Multilingual ability

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-772%
    claude-fable-5Leads82%
  • Translation

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-788%
    claude-fable-5Leads97%
  • Summarization

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-782%
    claude-fable-5Leads98%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-788%
    claude-fable-5Leads96%
  • Professional domains

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-793%
    claude-fable-5Leads98%
  • Information extraction

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-790%
    claude-fable-5Leads97%
  • Classification and labeling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-783%
    claude-fable-5Leads97%
  • Long-context handling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-756%
    claude-fable-5Leads99%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-792%
    claude-fable-5Leads99%
  • Structured output

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-798%
    claude-fable-598%
  • Factual accuracy

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-797%
    claude-fable-5Leads99%
  • Safety and alignment

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-795%
    claude-fable-5Leads99%
  • Steerability

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-794%
    claude-fable-5Leads99%
  • Output consistency

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-7Leads96%
    claude-fable-584%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-711%
    claude-fable-511%
  • Cost efficiency

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-7Leads17%
    claude-fable-515%
  • Image understanding

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-775%
    claude-fable-5No image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

97.14%

claude-fable-5

99.32%

Average response time

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

7,419.7 ms

claude-fable-5

8,411.23 ms

P95 API latency

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

30,000 ms

claude-fable-5

30,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7: 96.9%claude-fable-5: 100%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7: 7,629 msclaude-fable-5: 10,131 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7: 30,000 msclaude-fable-5: 30,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • claude-fable-5 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.

Keep exploring