anthropic/claude-opus-4-6
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6vskimi-k2.6
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k2.6
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6
text, image, json
kimi-k2.6
text, json
Vision
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Better fit
Supported
kimi-k2.6
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 · leads in 27
82%
Strong
kimi-k2.6 · leads in 2
54%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads86%kimi-k2.647%Logical reasoning
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads89%kimi-k2.660%Mathematics
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads86%kimi-k2.667%Scientific and technical depth
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads91%kimi-k2.653%Planning and task decomposition
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads88%kimi-k2.659%
Coding & tools
Code generation
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads80%kimi-k2.650%Debugging and code review
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads88%kimi-k2.658%Agentic coding
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads87%kimi-k2.660%Tool and function calling
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads90%kimi-k2.656%SQL and query writing
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads86%kimi-k2.659%
Writing & language
Creative writing
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads87%kimi-k2.644%Professional writing
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads91%kimi-k2.649%Conversational quality
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads90%kimi-k2.651%Multilingual ability
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads71%kimi-k2.665%Translation
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads87%kimi-k2.657%Summarization
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads82%kimi-k2.654%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads87%kimi-k2.662%Professional domains
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads92%kimi-k2.650%Information extraction
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads89%kimi-k2.664%Classification and labeling
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads82%kimi-k2.655%Long-context handling
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads56%kimi-k2.654%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads91%kimi-k2.655%Structured output
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads97%kimi-k2.667%Factual accuracy
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads96%kimi-k2.651%Safety and alignment
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads94%kimi-k2.643%Steerability
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads93%kimi-k2.648%Output consistency
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads95%kimi-k2.656%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
anthropic/claude-opus-4-611%kimi-k2.6Leads37%Cost efficiency
anthropic/claude-opus-4-616%kimi-k2.6Leads47%Image understanding
anthropic/claude-opus-4-672%kimi-k2.6No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6
98.13%
kimi-k2.6
100%
Average response time
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6
6,959.2 ms
kimi-k2.6
12,518.72 ms
P95 API latency
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6
30,000 ms
kimi-k2.6
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6: 98%kimi-k2.6: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6: 7,280 mskimi-k2.6: 16,670 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
anthropic/claude-opus-4-6: 30,000 mskimi-k2.6: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 supports image input while the other model does not.
- kimi-k2.6 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.