minimax-m3
Chat comparison
minimax-m3vsnemotron-3-nano:30b
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
nemotron-3-nano:30b
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
minimax-m3
512,000 tokens
nemotron-3-nano:30bBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
JSON mode
minimax-m3Better fit
Supported
nemotron-3-nano:30b
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
minimax-m3 · leads in 26
47%
Weak
nemotron-3-nano:30b · leads in 3
39%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
minimax-m3Leads35%nemotron-3-nano:30b28%Logical reasoning
minimax-m3Leads50%nemotron-3-nano:30b44%Mathematics
minimax-m3Leads51%nemotron-3-nano:30b47%Scientific and technical depth
minimax-m3Leads42%nemotron-3-nano:30b41%Planning and task decomposition
minimax-m3Leads52%nemotron-3-nano:30b43%
Coding & tools
Code generation
minimax-m3Leads37%nemotron-3-nano:30b35%Debugging and code review
minimax-m3Leads47%nemotron-3-nano:30b43%Agentic coding
minimax-m3Leads55%nemotron-3-nano:30b48%Tool and function calling
minimax-m3Leads51%nemotron-3-nano:30b37%SQL and query writing
minimax-m3Leads48%nemotron-3-nano:30b39%
Writing & language
Creative writing
minimax-m3Leads38%nemotron-3-nano:30b28%Professional writing
minimax-m3Leads40%nemotron-3-nano:30b24%Conversational quality
minimax-m3Leads43%nemotron-3-nano:30b29%Multilingual ability
minimax-m3Leads65%nemotron-3-nano:30b43%Translation
minimax-m3Leads50%nemotron-3-nano:30b35%Summarization
minimax-m3Leads48%nemotron-3-nano:30b47%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
minimax-m3Leads50%nemotron-3-nano:30b40%Professional domains
minimax-m3Leads43%nemotron-3-nano:30b29%Information extraction
minimax-m3Leads51%nemotron-3-nano:30b25%Classification and labeling
minimax-m3Leads51%nemotron-3-nano:30b43%Long-context handling
minimax-m359%nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads70%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
minimax-m3Leads46%nemotron-3-nano:30b21%Structured output
minimax-m3Leads51%nemotron-3-nano:30b8%Factual accuracy
minimax-m3Leads37%nemotron-3-nano:30b34%Safety and alignment
minimax-m3Leads35%nemotron-3-nano:30b29%Steerability
minimax-m3Leads44%nemotron-3-nano:30b31%Output consistency
minimax-m3Leads50%nemotron-3-nano:30b40%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
minimax-m340%nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads71%Cost efficiency
minimax-m352%nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads80%Image understanding
minimax-m3No image inputnemotron-3-nano:30bNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
minimax-m3
99.29%
nemotron-3-nano:30b
98.3%
Average response time
minimax-m3
22,425.83 ms
nemotron-3-nano:30b
3,194.26 ms
P95 API latency
minimax-m3
60,000 ms
nemotron-3-nano:30b
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- nemotron-3-nano:30b has a larger context window.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
- nemotron-3-nano:30b recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.