LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

OpenAI logo

gpt-oss:20bvsmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

Mistral AI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Tool calling

gpt-oss:20bBetter fit

Supported

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

gpt-oss:20b · leads in 8

30%

Weak

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407 · leads in 21

34%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    gpt-oss:20bLeads26%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240724%
  • Logical reasoning

    gpt-oss:20b14%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads15%
  • Mathematics

    gpt-oss:20b23%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads27%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    gpt-oss:20bLeads24%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240723%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    gpt-oss:20bLeads15%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240711%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    gpt-oss:20b32%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads35%
  • Debugging and code review

    gpt-oss:20bLeads26%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240724%
  • Agentic coding

    gpt-oss:20bLeads26%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-24078%
  • Tool and function calling

    gpt-oss:20bLeads30%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-24077%
  • SQL and query writing

    gpt-oss:20b27%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads35%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    gpt-oss:20b26%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads28%
  • Professional writing

    gpt-oss:20b24%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads30%
  • Conversational quality

    gpt-oss:20b21%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads30%
  • Multilingual ability

    gpt-oss:20b28%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads65%
  • Translation

    gpt-oss:20b25%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads32%
  • Summarization

    gpt-oss:20b21%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads25%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    gpt-oss:20bLeads22%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240721%
  • Professional domains

    gpt-oss:20bLeads19%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240718%
  • Information extraction

    gpt-oss:20b30%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads35%
  • Classification and labeling

    gpt-oss:20b31%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads37%
  • Long-context handling

    gpt-oss:20b26%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads29%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    gpt-oss:20b23%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads45%
  • Structured output

    gpt-oss:20b46%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads51%
  • Factual accuracy

    gpt-oss:20b25%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads37%
  • Safety and alignment

    gpt-oss:20b24%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads33%
  • Steerability

    gpt-oss:20b23%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads39%
  • Output consistency

    gpt-oss:20b51%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads71%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    gpt-oss:20b69%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads76%
  • Cost efficiency

    gpt-oss:20b80%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads84%
  • Image understanding

    gpt-oss:20bNo image input
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407No image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

gpt-oss:20b

99.11%

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

99.4%

Average response time

gpt-oss:20b

2,686.07 ms

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

5,547.3 ms

P95 API latency

gpt-oss:20b

10,000 ms

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

30,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

gpt-oss:20b: 99.3%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 97.1%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

gpt-oss:20b: 2,509 msmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 2,920 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

gpt-oss:20b: 10,000 msmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 30,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
  • gpt-oss:20b recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring