gpt-oss:20b
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-oss:20bvskimi-k2.7-code
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k2.7-code
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gpt-oss:20b
128,000 tokens
kimi-k2.7-codeBetter fit
256,000 tokens
Reasoning
gpt-oss:20b
Not supported
kimi-k2.7-codeBetter fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gpt-oss:20b · leads in 2
30%
Weak
kimi-k2.7-code · leads in 27
53%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-oss:20b26%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads37%Logical reasoning
gpt-oss:20b14%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads59%Mathematics
gpt-oss:20b23%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads68%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-oss:20b24%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads56%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-oss:20b15%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads62%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-oss:20b32%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads87%Debugging and code review
gpt-oss:20b26%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads88%Agentic coding
gpt-oss:20b26%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads81%Tool and function calling
gpt-oss:20b30%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads58%SQL and query writing
gpt-oss:20b27%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads84%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-oss:20b26%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads36%Professional writing
gpt-oss:20b24%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads39%Conversational quality
gpt-oss:20b21%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads41%Multilingual ability
gpt-oss:20b28%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads55%Translation
gpt-oss:20b25%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads48%Summarization
gpt-oss:20b21%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads48%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-oss:20b22%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads59%Professional domains
gpt-oss:20b19%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads43%Information extraction
gpt-oss:20b30%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads52%Classification and labeling
gpt-oss:20b31%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads44%Long-context handling
gpt-oss:20b26%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads52%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-oss:20b23%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads50%Structured output
gpt-oss:20b46%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads59%Factual accuracy
gpt-oss:20b25%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads44%Safety and alignment
gpt-oss:20b24%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads39%Steerability
gpt-oss:20b23%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads45%Output consistency
gpt-oss:20b51%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads53%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-oss:20bLeads69%kimi-k2.7-code30%Cost efficiency
gpt-oss:20bLeads80%kimi-k2.7-code34%Image understanding
gpt-oss:20bNo image inputkimi-k2.7-codeNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-oss:20b
99.11%
kimi-k2.7-code
99.83%
Average response time
gpt-oss:20b
2,686.07 ms
kimi-k2.7-code
6,571.81 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-oss:20b
10,000 ms
kimi-k2.7-code
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gpt-oss:20b: 99.3%kimi-k2.7-code: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-oss:20b: 2,509 mskimi-k2.7-code: 1,138 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-oss:20b: 10,000 mskimi-k2.7-code: 2,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- kimi-k2.7-code has a larger context window.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
- gpt-oss:20b recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.