gpt-6-luna
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-6-lunavskimi-k2.6
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k2.6
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
gpt-6-luna
text
kimi-k2.6
text, json
Reasoning
gpt-6-luna
Not supported
kimi-k2.6Better fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gpt-6-luna · leads in 12
52%
Moderate
kimi-k2.6 · leads in 15
54%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-6-lunaLeads72%kimi-k2.647%Logical reasoning
gpt-6-luna28%kimi-k2.6Leads60%Mathematics
gpt-6-luna42%kimi-k2.6Leads67%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-6-luna46%kimi-k2.6Leads53%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-6-luna29%kimi-k2.6Leads59%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-6-luna49%kimi-k2.6Leads50%Debugging and code review
gpt-6-luna39%kimi-k2.6Leads58%Agentic coding
gpt-6-luna35%kimi-k2.6Leads60%Tool and function calling
gpt-6-luna52%kimi-k2.6Leads56%SQL and query writing
gpt-6-luna48%kimi-k2.6Leads59%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-6-lunaLeads54%kimi-k2.644%Professional writing
gpt-6-lunaLeads59%kimi-k2.649%Conversational quality
gpt-6-lunaLeads54%kimi-k2.651%Multilingual ability
gpt-6-luna61%kimi-k2.6Leads65%Translation
gpt-6-luna57%kimi-k2.657%Summarization
gpt-6-luna37%kimi-k2.6Leads54%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-6-luna39%kimi-k2.6Leads62%Professional domains
gpt-6-luna49%kimi-k2.6Leads50%Information extraction
gpt-6-luna57%kimi-k2.6Leads64%Classification and labeling
gpt-6-lunaLeads62%kimi-k2.655%Long-context handling
gpt-6-luna22%kimi-k2.6Leads54%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-6-luna55%kimi-k2.655%Structured output
gpt-6-lunaLeads70%kimi-k2.667%Factual accuracy
gpt-6-lunaLeads59%kimi-k2.651%Safety and alignment
gpt-6-lunaLeads59%kimi-k2.643%Steerability
gpt-6-lunaLeads53%kimi-k2.648%Output consistency
gpt-6-lunaLeads80%kimi-k2.656%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-6-lunaLeads59%kimi-k2.637%Cost efficiency
gpt-6-lunaLeads71%kimi-k2.647%Image understanding
gpt-6-lunaNo image inputkimi-k2.6No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-6-luna
92.86%
kimi-k2.6
100%
Average response time
gpt-6-luna
47,470.23 ms
kimi-k2.6
12,518.72 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-6-luna
60,000 ms
kimi-k2.6
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6-luna: 92.6%kimi-k2.6: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6-luna: 48,342 mskimi-k2.6: 16,670 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6-luna: 60,000 mskimi-k2.6: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- kimi-k2.6 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- kimi-k2.6 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.