gpt-6-astra
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-6-astravsgrok-4.5
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
grok-4.5
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gpt-6-astraBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
grok-4.5
500,000 tokens
Input formats
gpt-6-astra
text, image
grok-4.5
text
Vision
gpt-6-astraBetter fit
Supported
grok-4.5
Not supported
Reasoning
gpt-6-astraBetter fit
Supported
grok-4.5
Not supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-6-astra
88.46%
grok-4.5
95.43%
Average response time
gpt-6-astra
17,699.29 ms
grok-4.5
4,505.11 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-6-astra
60,000 ms
grok-4.5
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6-astra: 100%grok-4.5: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6-astra: 6,466 msgrok-4.5: 19,135 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6-astra: 30,000 msgrok-4.5: 30,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-6-astra has a larger context window.
- gpt-6-astra supports image input while the other model does not.
- grok-4.5 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- grok-4.5 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.