LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

OpenAI logo

gpt-5.6-solvsgpt-6-astra

OpenAI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

gpt-5.6-sol · leads in 29

84%

Strong

gpt-6-astra · leads in 1

76%

Moderate

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    gpt-5.6-solLeads93%
    gpt-6-astra87%
  • Logical reasoning

    gpt-5.6-solLeads88%
    gpt-6-astra81%
  • Mathematics

    gpt-5.6-solLeads94%
    gpt-6-astra83%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    gpt-5.6-solLeads88%
    gpt-6-astra81%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    gpt-5.6-solLeads87%
    gpt-6-astra81%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    gpt-5.6-solLeads83%
    gpt-6-astra75%
  • Debugging and code review

    gpt-5.6-solLeads90%
    gpt-6-astra82%
  • Agentic coding

    gpt-5.6-solLeads91%
    gpt-6-astra83%
  • Tool and function calling

    gpt-5.6-solLeads88%
    gpt-6-astra82%
  • SQL and query writing

    gpt-5.6-solLeads91%
    gpt-6-astra82%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    gpt-5.6-solLeads79%
    gpt-6-astra77%
  • Professional writing

    gpt-5.6-solLeads85%
    gpt-6-astra79%
  • Conversational quality

    gpt-5.6-solLeads86%
    gpt-6-astra80%
  • Multilingual ability

    gpt-5.6-solLeads81%
    gpt-6-astra76%
  • Translation

    gpt-5.6-solLeads89%
    gpt-6-astra81%
  • Summarization

    gpt-5.6-solLeads85%
    gpt-6-astra77%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    gpt-5.6-solLeads91%
    gpt-6-astra84%
  • Professional domains

    gpt-5.6-solLeads86%
    gpt-6-astra81%
  • Information extraction

    gpt-5.6-solLeads92%
    gpt-6-astra82%
  • Classification and labeling

    gpt-5.6-solLeads97%
    gpt-6-astra86%
  • Long-context handling

    gpt-5.6-solLeads85%
    gpt-6-astra84%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    gpt-5.6-solLeads84%
    gpt-6-astra78%
  • Structured output

    gpt-5.6-solLeads90%
    gpt-6-astra84%
  • Factual accuracy

    gpt-5.6-solLeads83%
    gpt-6-astra75%
  • Safety and alignment

    gpt-5.6-solLeads74%
    gpt-6-astra72%
  • Steerability

    gpt-5.6-solLeads81%
    gpt-6-astra77%
  • Output consistency

    gpt-5.6-solLeads91%
    gpt-6-astra80%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    gpt-5.6-solLeads45%
    gpt-6-astra30%
  • Cost efficiency

    gpt-5.6-solLeads67%
    gpt-6-astra28%
  • Image understanding

    gpt-5.6-sol59%
    gpt-6-astraLeads61%

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

gpt-5.6-sol

94.33%

gpt-6-astra

95.38%

Average response time

gpt-5.6-sol

39,420.02 ms

gpt-6-astra

13,054.86 ms

P95 API latency

gpt-5.6-sol

60,000 ms

gpt-6-astra

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

gpt-5.6-sol: 100%gpt-6-astra: 100%
23 Sept23 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

gpt-5.6-sol: 6,078 msgpt-6-astra: 4,296 ms
23 Sept23 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

gpt-5.6-sol: 10,000 msgpt-6-astra: 10,000 ms
23 Sept23 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • gpt-6-astra recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.

Keep exploring