gpt-5.4-mini
Input $0.04 USD · Output $0.24 USD / 1M tokens
chat comparison
gpt-5.4-minivsgpt-oss:20b
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and observed LLM7 usage.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-oss:20b
Input $0.04 USD · Output $0.06 USD / 1M tokens
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gpt-5.4-miniBetter fit
400,000 tokens
gpt-oss:20b
128,000 tokens
Input formats
gpt-5.4-mini
text, image
gpt-oss:20b
text
Vision
gpt-5.4-miniBetter fit
Supported
gpt-oss:20b
Not supported
Reasoning
gpt-5.4-miniBetter fit
Supported
gpt-oss:20b
Not supported
Observed usage comparison
A 30-day LLM7 snapshot, not a global model benchmark.
Requests handled
gpt-5.4-mini
57
gpt-oss:20b
474
Observed success rate
gpt-5.4-mini
43.86%
gpt-oss:20b
99.79%
Average API latency
gpt-5.4-mini
14,631.46 ms
gpt-oss:20b
4,323.41 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-5.4-mini
60,000 ms
gpt-oss:20b
30,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Try the same request volume against both public price lists.
Cost calculator
Adjust the volume to see an instant estimate at the current public price.
01M
Input estimate
$0.0004
Output estimate
$0.0006
Estimated total
$0.001
Cost calculator
Adjust the volume to see an instant estimate at the current public price.
01M
Input estimate
$0.0004
Output estimate
$0.00015
Estimated total
$0.00055
Quick take
- gpt-5.4-mini has a larger context window.
- gpt-5.4-mini supports image input while the other model does not.
- gpt-oss:20b recorded a higher observed LLM7 request success rate during this period.
- gpt-oss:20b recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.