gpt-5.3-codex-spark
Input $0.36 USD · Output $2.81 USD / 1M tokens
chat comparison
gpt-5.3-codex-sparkvsgpt-5.4-mini
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and observed LLM7 usage.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-5.4-mini
Input $0.04 USD · Output $0.24 USD / 1M tokens
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
gpt-5.3-codex-spark
text
gpt-5.4-mini
text, image
Vision
gpt-5.3-codex-spark
Not supported
gpt-5.4-miniBetter fit
Supported
Observed usage comparison
A 30-day LLM7 snapshot, not a global model benchmark.
Requests handled
gpt-5.3-codex-spark
52
gpt-5.4-mini
57
Observed success rate
gpt-5.3-codex-spark
100%
gpt-5.4-mini
43.86%
Average API latency
gpt-5.3-codex-spark
1,363.69 ms
gpt-5.4-mini
14,631.46 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-5.3-codex-spark
5,000 ms
gpt-5.4-mini
60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Try the same request volume against both public price lists.
Cost calculator
Adjust the volume to see an instant estimate at the current public price.
01M
Input estimate
$0.0036
Output estimate
$0.007025
Estimated total
$0.010625
Cost calculator
Adjust the volume to see an instant estimate at the current public price.
01M
Input estimate
$0.0004
Output estimate
$0.0006
Estimated total
$0.001
Quick take
- gpt-5.4-mini supports image input while the other model does not.
- gpt-5.3-codex-spark recorded a higher observed LLM7 request success rate during this period.
- gpt-5.3-codex-spark recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.