GLM-5.3-Flash
Chat comparison
GLM-5.3-Flashvsmistral-large-3:675b
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
mistral-large-3:675b
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
GLM-5.3-FlashBetter fit
400,000 tokens
mistral-large-3:675b
256,000 tokens
Input formats
GLM-5.3-Flash
text
mistral-large-3:675b
text, image
Vision
GLM-5.3-Flash
Not supported
mistral-large-3:675bBetter fit
Supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
GLM-5.3-Flash
82.58%
mistral-large-3:675b
100%
Average response time
GLM-5.3-Flash
30,155.81 ms
mistral-large-3:675b
1,389 ms
P95 API latency
GLM-5.3-Flash
60,000 ms
mistral-large-3:675b
5,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- GLM-5.3-Flash has a larger context window.
- mistral-large-3:675b supports image input while the other model does not.