GLM-5.3-Flash
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
GLM-5.3-Flashvsminimax-m2.7
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
minimax-m2.7
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
GLM-5.3-FlashBetter fit
400,000 tokens
minimax-m2.7
180,000 tokens
Streaming
GLM-5.3-FlashBetter fit
Supported
minimax-m2.7
Not supported
JSON mode
GLM-5.3-Flash
Not supported
minimax-m2.7Better fit
Supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
GLM-5.3-Flash
82.77%
minimax-m2.7
91.38%
Average response time
GLM-5.3-Flash
29,977.45 ms
minimax-m2.7
23,175.04 ms
P95 API latency
GLM-5.3-Flash
60,000 ms
minimax-m2.7
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
GLM-5.3-Flash: 86%minimax-m2.7: 67.7%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
GLM-5.3-Flash: 23,005 msminimax-m2.7: 43,855 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
GLM-5.3-Flash: 60,000 msminimax-m2.7: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- GLM-5.3-Flash has a larger context window.
- minimax-m2.7 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.