LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Z.ai logo

glm-5.3vsgpt-6-luna

OpenAI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Reasoning

glm-5.3Better fit

Supported

gpt-6-luna

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

glm-5.3 · leads in 17

58%

Moderate

gpt-6-luna · leads in 10

52%

Moderate

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    glm-5.353%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads72%
  • Logical reasoning

    glm-5.3Leads61%
    gpt-6-luna28%
  • Mathematics

    glm-5.3Leads66%
    gpt-6-luna42%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    glm-5.3Leads59%
    gpt-6-luna46%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    glm-5.3Leads61%
    gpt-6-luna29%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    glm-5.3Leads50%
    gpt-6-luna49%
  • Debugging and code review

    glm-5.3Leads61%
    gpt-6-luna39%
  • Agentic coding

    glm-5.3Leads64%
    gpt-6-luna35%
  • Tool and function calling

    glm-5.3Leads57%
    gpt-6-luna52%
  • SQL and query writing

    glm-5.3Leads65%
    gpt-6-luna48%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    glm-5.347%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads54%
  • Professional writing

    glm-5.354%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads59%
  • Conversational quality

    glm-5.351%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads54%
  • Multilingual ability

    glm-5.3Leads86%
    gpt-6-luna61%
  • Translation

    glm-5.3Leads64%
    gpt-6-luna57%
  • Summarization

    glm-5.3Leads60%
    gpt-6-luna37%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    glm-5.3Leads64%
    gpt-6-luna39%
  • Professional domains

    glm-5.3Leads56%
    gpt-6-luna49%
  • Information extraction

    glm-5.3Leads62%
    gpt-6-luna57%
  • Classification and labeling

    glm-5.3Leads63%
    gpt-6-luna62%
  • Long-context handling

    glm-5.3Leads75%
    gpt-6-luna22%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    glm-5.355%
    gpt-6-luna55%
  • Structured output

    glm-5.360%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads70%
  • Factual accuracy

    glm-5.353%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads59%
  • Safety and alignment

    glm-5.347%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads59%
  • Steerability

    glm-5.353%
    gpt-6-luna53%
  • Output consistency

    glm-5.360%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads80%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    glm-5.334%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads59%
  • Cost efficiency

    glm-5.336%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads71%
  • Image understanding

    glm-5.3No image input
    gpt-6-lunaNo image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

glm-5.3

98.84%

gpt-6-luna

92.86%

Average response time

glm-5.3

20,395.48 ms

gpt-6-luna

47,470.23 ms

P95 API latency

glm-5.3

60,000 ms

gpt-6-luna

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

glm-5.3: 100%gpt-6-luna: 92.6%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

glm-5.3: 5,597 msgpt-6-luna: 48,342 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

glm-5.3: 10,000 msgpt-6-luna: 60,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • glm-5.3 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.

Keep exploring