glm-5.2
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
glm-5.2vsseed-2.0-mini
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
seed-2.0-mini
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
glm-5.2Better fit
976,000 tokens
seed-2.0-mini
250,000 tokens
Reasoning
glm-5.2Better fit
Supported
seed-2.0-mini
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
glm-5.2 · leads in 27
56%
Moderate
seed-2.0-mini · leads in 2
21%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
glm-5.2Leads50%seed-2.0-mini14%Logical reasoning
glm-5.2Leads57%seed-2.0-mini8%Mathematics
glm-5.2Leads62%seed-2.0-mini12%Scientific and technical depth
glm-5.2Leads56%seed-2.0-mini11%Planning and task decomposition
glm-5.2Leads57%seed-2.0-mini11%
Coding & tools
Code generation
glm-5.2Leads47%seed-2.0-mini15%Debugging and code review
glm-5.2Leads58%seed-2.0-mini13%Agentic coding
glm-5.2Leads61%seed-2.0-mini21%Tool and function calling
glm-5.2Leads55%seed-2.0-mini23%SQL and query writing
glm-5.2Leads63%seed-2.0-mini16%
Writing & language
Creative writing
glm-5.2Leads44%seed-2.0-mini12%Professional writing
glm-5.2Leads51%seed-2.0-mini15%Conversational quality
glm-5.2Leads49%seed-2.0-mini10%Multilingual ability
glm-5.2Leads84%seed-2.0-mini16%Translation
glm-5.2Leads61%seed-2.0-mini13%Summarization
glm-5.2Leads57%seed-2.0-mini19%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
glm-5.2Leads61%seed-2.0-mini16%Professional domains
glm-5.2Leads53%seed-2.0-mini12%Information extraction
glm-5.2Leads61%seed-2.0-mini24%Classification and labeling
glm-5.2Leads61%seed-2.0-mini23%Long-context handling
glm-5.2Leads67%seed-2.0-mini33%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
glm-5.2Leads53%seed-2.0-mini17%Structured output
glm-5.2Leads60%seed-2.0-mini38%Factual accuracy
glm-5.2Leads50%seed-2.0-mini16%Safety and alignment
glm-5.2Leads45%seed-2.0-mini17%Steerability
glm-5.2Leads49%seed-2.0-mini14%Output consistency
glm-5.2Leads60%seed-2.0-mini52%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
glm-5.237%seed-2.0-miniLeads68%Cost efficiency
glm-5.243%seed-2.0-miniLeads48%Image understanding
glm-5.2No image inputseed-2.0-miniNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
glm-5.2
99.94%
seed-2.0-mini
100%
Average response time
glm-5.2
2,766.68 ms
seed-2.0-mini
6,796.87 ms
P95 API latency
glm-5.2
10,000 ms
seed-2.0-mini
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 100%seed-2.0-mini: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 666 msseed-2.0-mini: 5,772 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 5,000 msseed-2.0-mini: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- glm-5.2 has a larger context window.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
- glm-5.2 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.