glm-5.2
Chat comparison
glm-5.2vsmistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
glm-5.2Better fit
976,000 tokens
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
32,000 tokens
Tool calling
glm-5.2Better fit
Supported
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
Not supported
Reasoning
glm-5.2Better fit
Supported
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
Not supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
glm-5.2
100%
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
100%
Average response time
glm-5.2
3,617.34 ms
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
4,366.12 ms
P95 API latency
glm-5.2
10,000 ms
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- glm-5.2 has a larger context window.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
- glm-5.2 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.